[IANA-RC] ACTION ITEM 190320-1 : Updates to our current Operating procedures

Jason Schiller jason-phone at schiller.net
Sun Aug 25 01:22:23 CEST 2019


German,

Just thought I would ping this thread to bring it back up to the top of the
in box in support of ACTION ITEM 190320-1, and add the action item number
to make the thread easy to find.

___Jason

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:45 PM Jason Schiller <jason-phone at schiller.net>
wrote:

> All,
>
> As promised I have put together proposed changes to our operating
> procedures.
>
> To see a red-lined version with all changes as suggestions (or to make
> suggestions) see:
> -
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#
>
>   The red-line document has suggestions and comments which you will not
> see
>   unless you are logged in to a gMail account and request access to
> comment.
>   https://support.google.com/docs/answer/6239515
>   The document without the comments is the current procedures.
>
> To see a pdf of the red-line changes see:
> -
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RrdAEgpkbj3fCZA7anWYwlVgb0U_x7y4/view?usp=sharing
>
> To see a clean copy with all changes accepted see:
> -
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kq40uwR0vetBcXmeMV6PSgY9gINsyLmdEDtaiKgNTn0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> To see this summary see:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pP94Epk9Ye-ag4Px9FE2ADFS37IgurbibCiFyo13wbg/edit?usp=sharing
>
> There are two changes:
>
> 1. Section 5. Review process was rewritten and reorganized.
>
> 2. Preamble (section 0) text
>
> As a reminder, none of this text has changed since April 2018.  So if you
> reviewed
>
> the text then, this will look identical. (Of course if you did not have
> comment rights on
>
> the Google Doc, and didn’t look at the text version included in the body
> of the email,
>
> then you may not have seen these changes before.  Again my apologies for
> that.)
>
> New section 5
>
> -------------------
>
> "5. Review Process
>
> At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA
> Numbering
>
> Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review
> of
>
> the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This
> review
>
> matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five
> RIR
>
> communities for a comment period of 30 days.
>
> 5.1 Expedited Performance Report
>
> In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the
> NRO EC
>
> chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
>
> 5.2 Community Feedback
>
> The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their
> respective
>
> RIR communities during their term. They should communicate relevant
>
> developments relating to the Committee to their respective community, and
> collect
>
> feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services Operations from their
> respective
>
> community.  This input will be provided to the RIRs as advice when
> appropriate.
>
> These comments will be reviewed and summarized by the Review Committee and
>
> included in the IANA Numbering Services Operations Performance Report."
>
>
> Old section 5
>
> ------------------
>
> "5. Review Process
>
> At a time of the NRO EC’s choosing, the RIRs will publish an IANA
> Numbering
>
> Services Review Matrix in January every year, summarizing the RIRs’ review
> of
>
> the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This
> review
>
> matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five
> RIR
>
> communities for a comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee members
>
> are responsible to make sure their respective communities are informed
> about the
>
> comment period, using their region’s relevant communication and
> announcement
>
> channels. Following the closure of the public comment, the Review
> Committee
>
> gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews
> and
>
> summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review
> matrix,
>
> with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the
> NRO
>
> EC as advice. “
>
> Changes to section 5
>
> ----------------------------
>
> First two sentences were kept as is.
>
> The rest of the text was largely about community input and rewritten into
> section 5.2
>
> and the details of how the final report will be constructed (based on the
> matrix, and
>
> that it is published and submitted to the NRO EC as advice) are largely
> lost.  We did
>
> keep the notion that summarized community input will be reviewed and
> included in
>
> the report, and also added that this advice can be sent (outside of a
> formal report)
>
> to the RIRs as appropriate.
>
> The old text on community input was primarily focused on ensuring the RIR
>
> communities are aware of the report and its comment period, and the
> comments
>
> are collected and considered.
>
> The new text is a bit more general including the fact that the members are
> expected
>
> to be “engaged” in both communicating relevant developments to the
> community and
>
> collecting relevant feedback throughout their term (as opposed to only
> during the 30
>
> day comment period).  It also scopes what is relevant as relating to IANA
> Numbering
>
> Services Operations.
>
> Section 5.2 supporting that the NRO can request an “out of cycle” report
> was added.
>
>
>
> 2. The following preamble text was added:
>
> “The Review Committee’s function is to advise and assist the NRO EC in its
> periodic review of the service level of the IANA Numbering Services
> provided to the Internet Number Community.
>
> The Review Committee is a tool for the Internet Number Community to
> evaluate and review performance of the IANA Numbering Services provided.
> Review Committee will ensure community involvement and will support and
> enhance the multistakeholder model in a transparent, open, and bottom up
> process to ensure that the number resources component of the IANA
> operations meets the needs and expectations of its customers, namely the
> Internet numbers community.”
>
> This was previously “section 0” text.
>
> We previously decided it wasn’t really Operating Procedures, but that it
> was important and placed the text on our web site.  The text was recently
> dropped from our web site during some editing in an effort to streamline
> the web site.
>
> I think it is appropriate to include this text with (but maybe not
> necessarily a part of) our operating procedures, as the text is most likely
> to be relevant when considering the context of our operating procedures,
> and there very little burden to adding a paragraph to our operating
> procedures as compared to maintaining that text on our website.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ___Jason
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:50 PM Bertrand Cherrier <
> b.cherrier at micrologic.nc> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Susannah !
>>
>> Enjoy thy week-end
>>
>> Cordialement,
>> ___________________________________________
>> Bertrand Cherrier
>> Administration Systèmes - R&D
>> Micro Logic Systems
>> b.cherrier at micrologic.nc
>> https://www.mls.nc
>> Tél : +687 24 99 24
>> VoIP : 65 24 99 24
>> SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
>>
>> Le 12 mai 2018 à 12:09, Susannah Gray <susannah at apnic.net> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi RC,
>>
>> The new procedures have been uploaded:
>> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/IANA-Review-Committee-Operating-Procedures_30-April-2018.pdf
>>
>> (linked from here:
>> https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-committee/)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Susannah
>>
>> On 09/05/2018 02:26, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Ernesto, Nate, Mahdvi, Noah, and Nicolas for your supporting
>> comments.
>>
>> I have seen no objections to the edits. As agreed, we will therefore
>> adopt these changes into our operational procedures.
>>
>> German and the NRO secretariat,
>> could I please ask you to incorporate these comments and update the PDF
>> on the RC website?
>>
>> Thanks and kind regards,
>>
>> Nurani
>>
>>
>> On 2 May 2018, at 08:00, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Jason.
>> This looks good.
>>
>> As agreed, we will give everyone 7 days to review this and if there are
>> no objections or further adjustments deemed necessary, we will adopt these
>> changes as part of our operational procedures.
>>
>> Please provide any comments you may have before 9 May 12.00 UTC.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Nurani
>>
>> On 2 May 2018, at 02:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone at schiller.net> wrote:
>>
>> As per our meeting I am providing our current operating procedures
>> (version 1) with edits.
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NeXGqxadTTkVDR9wPWV0sC-gIQ0xZB1fzpYo5SRfeDA/edit#
>>
>> The edits include new sections 5.1 and 5.2.  This is the text Filiz
>> provided.
>>
>> In addition some text from section 5 has been removed as it has been
>> superseded by the text in sections 5.1 and 5.2.
>>
>> The new text is also included below for reference.
>>
>> NOTE: There were other suggestions that are not included in this
>> update.  I would like to defer discussion of any other updates until after
>> this change is adopted unless you think the acceptance of this change
>> is dependent on one or more of the other suggested changes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> __Jason
>>
>> "5.1 Expedited Performance Report
>>
>> In the event there is a requirement to complete an expedited review, the
>> NRO EC chair will advise the Review Committee chairs of the requirement.
>>
>> 5.2 Community Feedback
>>
>> The Review Committee members are expected to be engaged with their
>> respective RIR communities during their term. They should communicate
>> relevant developments relating to the Committee to their respective
>> community, and collect feedback relevant to the IANA Numbering Services
>> Operations from their respective community.  This input will be provided to
>> the RIRs as advice when appropriate. These comments will be reviewed and
>> summarized by the Review Committee and included in the IANA Numbering
>> Services Operations Performance Report."
>>
>>
>> The removed section 5 text is as follows:
>>
>> "The Review Committee members are responsible to make sure their
>> respective communities are informed about the comment period, using their
>> region’s relevant communication and announcement channels. Following the
>> closure of the public comment, the Review Committee gathers input and
>> comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises.
>> The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the
>> summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as
>> advice."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rc mailing list
>> Rc at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rc mailing listRc at nro.nethttps://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>>
>> --
>> Susannah Gray
>> NRO Secretariat Supportwww.nro.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rc mailing list
>> Rc at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rc mailing list
>> Rc at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20190824/e0e7ccf9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list