[IANA-RC] Minutes 20 March 2019 Teleconference

Jason Schiller jason-phone at schiller.net
Wed Apr 10 00:37:44 CEST 2019


I support approval of the minutes and the publishing of the minutes without
the need for a meeting.

Thanks,
___Jason

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:32 AM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net> wrote:

> Thank you Susannah.
>
> Thank you also to those of you who have spoken in support of approving
> these minutes as they stand now, on the mailing list (without waiting for
> the meeting at the end of the year).
>
> I will give the group until the end of the week to provide any further
> modifications to the minutes.
>
> If there are no further comments or objections this week, I propose we
> move forward and approve the minutes.
>
> Kind regards,
> Nurani
>
>
>
> On 8 Apr 2019, at 20:00, Richard Jimmerson <richardj at arin.net> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Susannah.
>
> Nurani – I support the approval of these minutes without a meeting.
>
> -Richard Jimmerson
>
>
> *From: *<rc-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of Susannah Gray <
> susannah at apnic.net>
> *Date: *Monday, April 8, 2019 at 1:58 PM
> *To: *"rc at nro.net" <rc at nro.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [IANA-RC] Minutes 20 March 2019 Teleconference
>
> Hi Nurani, all,
> Please find attached an updated version (0.3) of the minutes.
> This version contains the text replacement outlined by Jason in point 2
> below.
> Once approved, I'll upload to the website.
> Kind regards,
> Susannah
> On 07/04/2019 22:33, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>
> Dear IANA RC members,
>
> I understand from Jason that this satisfies his concerns.
> As our next IANA RC meeting is not until the end of the year, I suggest we
> move to approve these minutes on the mailing list.
>
> Could I ask you all to please review the minutes and unless you have any
> further modifications or correction, support an approval of these minutes?
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Nurani
>
>
>
> On 4 Apr 2019, at 14:31, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Apologise for the slow response on this.
>
>
> On 29 Mar 2019, at 03:49, Jason Schiller <jason-phone at schiller.net> wrote:
>
> 2 comments:
>
> 1. I don’t have a suggested change for the first one, but would like to
> draw your attention the follow notes, and provide my impression of what
> this note is missing. Hopefully someone with a more clear recollection can
> suggest a specific change.
>
> “NN continued that the RIR staff and the NRO Secretariat should consider
> this comment. The report was published on the NRO website and there might
> be accessibility considerations that need to be taken into account or there
> might need to be changes in the way the report was displayed on the
> website.”
>
> It is my impression that the flavor of this comment was in light of this
> work being out of the RC’s scope, and that it should really fall to the
> RIRs and/or the NRO to address accessibility (being it is on their sight,
> and that it may require commitment of resources well above what a handful
> of volunteers can offer). I don’t get that impression from the notes.
>
> Can someone confirm if this matches their recollection, and if so maybe
> suggest an edit?
>
>
> Indeed, that is what I was suggesting, as most of the accessibility
> considerations really apply more to the website and how the report is made
> available. But I feel that the paragraph in the minutes convey that.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. Replace
>
> “JS noted that the RC had just agreed to change its Operating Procedures.
> The previous text made it sound it like the community was aware that there
> was an open comment period and that the comments would be collected and
> reviewed. The new procedures now note that the RC is only interested in
> feedback from the community that is relevant to the IANA number services
> operations.”
>
> With
> “JS noted that the RC had just agreed to change its Operating Procedures.
> The previous text made it sound it like the RC’s responsibility was to
> simply make sure that community was aware that there was an open comment
> period and that the comments would be collected and reviewed.
>
> The new procedures now narrows the scope, noting that the RC is only
> interested in feedback from the community that is relevant to the IANA
> number services operations, but otherwise generally opens the
> responsibility, clarifying that the RC should be continuously engaged with
> the community.”
>
> Wrt publishing the minutes, personally I would be comfortable publishing
> final or draft minutes given there has been sufficient discussion (or at
> least a large number of members saying sounds good to me) on list and no
> one objects.
>
>
> Taking into consideration your suggested amendment, I am satisfied with
> the minutes from the last RC meeting.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nurani
>
>
>
>
> Anyone care to suggest a specific edit on my first point (or at least
> chime in and let me know if your recollection differs or supports my
> recollection)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ___Jason
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:52 AM German Valdez <german at apnic.net> wrote:
>
> Dear RC
>
> I'm attaching minutes from last week teleconference for your review.
>
> Given that the next IANA RC teleconference is scheduled for the last
> quarter of the year, it would be possible to seek for an approval of this
> minutes on the list instead of waiting some months before his publication ?
> or are you ok to publish this minutes as draft ?
>
> Regards
>
> German
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Rc mailing list
>
> Rc at nro.net
>
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
> --
>
> Susannah Gray
>
> NRO Secretariat Support
>
> www.nro.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20190409/bb781692/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list