[IANA-RC] IANA RC update for ARIN 43

Louie Lee louie at louie.net
Tue Apr 9 15:42:56 CEST 2019


Thanks for the feedback. I will try to incorporate them in time for
resending to ARIN staff since my presentation is in 40 minutes.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:26 AM Jason Schiller <jason-phone at schiller.net>
wrote:

> Slide 5: Role
>
> That text is now the preamble of our operating procedures and not at the
> link at the bottom.
>
> Perhaps you can update the link to point to our procedures.
>
> Slide 7:   Current work status
> User redefine operation procedures I would add:
> - clarified RC member - community engagement
>    — scoped to things relating to IANA services
>          performance
>     — increased communication
>
> (This will nicely support your 2nd to the last slide)
>
> —-Jason
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:54 AM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Louie,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing this. It looks good. :)
>>
>> I only have one comment and that is regarding the two informal comments
>> after the public comment period.
>>
>> First of all, I think it should be made more clear that there were no
>> comments during the open comment period, and there were no modifications
>> required to the report. While we encourage feedback in this period, we were
>> also not surprised by the lack of comments, as there were no issues noted
>> in our IANA RC report.
>>
>> As for the two comments, if you include that, I think it needs to be made
>> clear that they were not part of the public comment period and that they
>> were minor ones. In fact, the one about the buttons was only sent to me
>> informally and not to the RC, and stated "you can ignore this nit”, so I
>> don’t think it needs to be given that prominence in the presentation.
>>
>> I suggest making it a little clearer that the two comments we received
>> were minor ones on the formatting/Accessibility and not on the substance. I
>> think it’s fine to mention what they were in your talk, but I suggest
>> removing the actual comments off the slide. Not because there is anything
>> controversial in there, but as they were received after the public comment
>> period, and as they were not included in the report, I think it causes
>> confusion if you include the specific comments in your presentation.
>>
>> Perhaps you can simply say that in our post-report evaluation, we
>> discussed lessons learnt and further potential improvements for next year,
>> and these informal comments were brought into that discussion as part of
>> the continuous improvement work.
>>
>> Hope this makes sense. If not, feel free to reach out.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Nurani
>>
>>
>> > On 8 Apr 2019, at 23:31, Louie Lee <louie at louie.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi RC Members,
>> >
>> > Attached is the slide deck for my IANA RC update presentation at the
>> ARIN 43 meeting tomorrow. Please review for accuracy.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Louie
>> >
>> > P.S. Please mail me directly for access to the source file if you'd
>> like to adapt it for presenting at other venues.
>> > <rc-ARIN-43.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> > Rc mailing list
>> > Rc at nro.net
>> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rc mailing list
>> Rc at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20190409/677822b0/attachment.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list