[IANA-RC] IANA RC update for ARIN 43

Jason Schiller jason-phone at schiller.net
Tue Apr 9 14:27:12 CEST 2019


Slide 5: Role

That text is now the preamble of our operating procedures and not at the
link at the bottom.

Perhaps you can update the link to point to our procedures.

Slide 7:   Current work status
User redefine operation procedures I would add:
- clarified RC member - community engagement
   — scoped to things relating to IANA services
         performance
    — increased communication

(This will nicely support your 2nd to the last slide)

—-Jason

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:54 AM Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net> wrote:

> Hi Louie,
>
> Thanks for sharing this. It looks good. :)
>
> I only have one comment and that is regarding the two informal comments
> after the public comment period.
>
> First of all, I think it should be made more clear that there were no
> comments during the open comment period, and there were no modifications
> required to the report. While we encourage feedback in this period, we were
> also not surprised by the lack of comments, as there were no issues noted
> in our IANA RC report.
>
> As for the two comments, if you include that, I think it needs to be made
> clear that they were not part of the public comment period and that they
> were minor ones. In fact, the one about the buttons was only sent to me
> informally and not to the RC, and stated "you can ignore this nit”, so I
> don’t think it needs to be given that prominence in the presentation.
>
> I suggest making it a little clearer that the two comments we received
> were minor ones on the formatting/Accessibility and not on the substance. I
> think it’s fine to mention what they were in your talk, but I suggest
> removing the actual comments off the slide. Not because there is anything
> controversial in there, but as they were received after the public comment
> period, and as they were not included in the report, I think it causes
> confusion if you include the specific comments in your presentation.
>
> Perhaps you can simply say that in our post-report evaluation, we
> discussed lessons learnt and further potential improvements for next year,
> and these informal comments were brought into that discussion as part of
> the continuous improvement work.
>
> Hope this makes sense. If not, feel free to reach out.
>
> Kind regards,
> Nurani
>
>
> > On 8 Apr 2019, at 23:31, Louie Lee <louie at louie.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi RC Members,
> >
> > Attached is the slide deck for my IANA RC update presentation at the
> ARIN 43 meeting tomorrow. Please review for accuracy.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Louie
> >
> > P.S. Please mail me directly for access to the source file if you'd like
> to adapt it for presenting at other venues.
> > <rc-ARIN-43.pdf>_______________________________________________
> > Rc mailing list
> > Rc at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20190409/041f6ea2/attachment.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list