[IANA-RC] Draft Review Process

Madhvi Gokool madhvi at afrinic.net
Tue Mar 7 14:30:35 CET 2017


hello

I agree with Filiz's proposal. Workable for AFRINIC.

Regards

Madhvi


On 07/03/2017 4:26 PM, Nate Davis wrote:
> Yes – this is workable for ARIN.
>
> Thanks!
>
> From: <rc-bounces at nro.net <mailto:rc-bounces at nro.net>> on behalf of
> Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net <mailto:nurani at nimblebits.net>>
> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 3:04 AM
> To: Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com <mailto:koalafil at gmail.com>>
> Cc: "rc at nro.net <mailto:rc at nro.net>" <rc at nro.net <mailto:rc at nro.net>>
> Subject: Re: [IANA-RC] Draft Review Process
>
> Hi Filiz,
>
> Hm, that is a very good, practical point. Full calendar years makes
> much more sense of course. It should be rather easy for the RIRs to
> summarise the year in January and then for the community and us to
> review it in February. 
>
> I support this change.
>
> RIR staff - does this seem workable to you too?
>
> Kind regards,
> Nurani
>
>
>
>> On 6 Mar 2017, at 11:15, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com
>> <mailto:koalafil at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nurani,
>>
>> Thanks for putting this together. I like it, concise, to the point
>> and easy to read. 
>>
>> I just have one comment and suggestion for a change:
>>
>> Instead of September I propose: 
>>
>> "The RIRs will publish an IANA numbering services review matrix in
>> *January* of *every calendar year*, summarising the RIR’s review of
>> the performance of the IANA numbering services*in the previous
>> calendar year..."*
>> *
>> *
>> This way RIRs can report on a full calendar year and then we can
>> review that in say February. 
>> So first report will come to us from RIRs in 2018 January, covering
>> practices and performance of IANA in the entire 2017. 
>> Then we review it in Feb and publish our review. 
>> Then in 2019 Jan, RIRs send their report to us in Jan about the
>> practices seen in 2018, etc etc...
>>  
>> This will make things much easier in my opinion, both managing
>> deadlines, doing the work and then reporting what is done publicly too.  
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Filiz
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net
>> <mailto:nurani at nimblebits.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     In an attempt to move forward on defining scope and processes for
>>     this group, I have drafted a proposed Review Process below. I
>>     believe this reflects the intention of the CRISP proposal.
>>
>>     Given that there are only ~3 requests per year in total for all
>>     RIRs, and that we have a history of 20+ years of stable services
>>     that the RIRs have been satisfied with, I believe it does not
>>     have to be more complicated than this. 
>>
>>     Happy to discuss any details of this. (The timing, such as
>>     September every year, and 30 days comment period, are merely
>>     suggestions. Feel free to suggest adjustments to these as you see
>>     fit.)
>>
>>     Kind regards,
>>
>>     Nurani Nimpuno
>>
>>
>>     -----------------------
>>     Review Process
>>     The RIRs will publish an IANA numbering services review matrix in
>>     September every year, summarising the RIR’s review of the
>>     performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This
>>     review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes
>>     it on to the five respective RIR communities for a public comment
>>     period of 30 days. The Review Committee gathers input and
>>     comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and
>>     summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the
>>     review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it
>>     publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice.
>>     -----------------------
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Rc mailing list
>>     Rc at nro.net <mailto:Rc at nro.net>
>>     https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>>     <https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20170307/01a41f7b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list