[IANA-RC] Draft Review Process
george at apnic.net
Sat Mar 4 07:19:27 CET 2017
Thanks for sharing your proposed review process. It is clear to me and i think it's also simple enough to work with.
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Mar 2017, at 09:32, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net<mailto:nurani at nimblebits.net>> wrote:
In an attempt to move forward on defining scope and processes for this group, I have drafted a proposed Review Process below. I believe this reflects the intention of the CRISP proposal.
Given that there are only ~3 requests per year in total for all RIRs, and that we have a history of 20+ years of stable services that the RIRs have been satisfied with, I believe it does not have to be more complicated than this.
Happy to discuss any details of this. (The timing, such as September every year, and 30 days comment period, are merely suggestions. Feel free to suggest adjustments to these as you see fit.)
The RIRs will publish an IANA numbering services review matrix in September every year, summarising the RIR’s review of the performance of the IANA numbering services in the last year. This review matrix gets submitted to the Review Committee who passes it on to the five respective RIR communities for a public comment period of 30 days. The Review Committee gathers input and comments from the five RIR communities, which it reviews and summarises. The Review Committee compiles a final report on the review matrix, with the summarised input appended, which it publishes and submits to the NRO EC as advice.
Rc mailing list
Rc at nro.net<mailto:Rc at nro.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rc