[IANA-RC] Doodle Poll IANA RC First Teleconference - DEADLINE Thursday February 2nd

Jason Schiller jason-phone at schiller.net
Thu Feb 2 16:27:57 CET 2017


Oh my...  thank you for keeping me honest.  (Apologies for any confusion).

So it seems Wednesday is indeed better, especially so considering Omo newly
ability to attend.

___Jason

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote:

> Jason, not sure if your voting member count is correct:
> With Thursday I see 3 voting member missing.
> Wednesday only 2.
>
> Just for your information.
>
> Filiz
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, German Valdez <german at apnic.net> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Yes, difficult situation, on Thursday we would miss 3 voting members
> against 2 on Wednesday.
> >
> > Unless I hear from you,  I’ll publicise the suggested date and time of
> the teleconference on Monday February 6th
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > German
> >
> >
> >> On 3 Feb 2017, at 1:11 AM, Jason Schiller <jschiller at google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday we have the LACNIC staff member, but loose an AFRINIC
> voting member.
> >>
> >> (I am not trying to suggest one is more important that the other wrt
> quorum and getting stuff done.
> >>   Certainly having an AFRINIC  voting member is important to voting,
> >>   but either way we have less than 8 voting members and thus I don't
> believe we can "take any actions")
> >>
> >> I am ok with either day.
> >>
> >> __Jason
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:03 AM, German Valdez <german at apnic.net>
> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Wednesday 15/2 @ 12:00 PM UTC  and Thursday 16/2 @ 11:00 AM UTC have
> the same results 12 yes and 3 no
> >>
> >> I would suggest to go for the earliest option where more community
> representatives are available.
> >>
> >> Are you ok with the approach?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> German
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On 3 Feb 2017, at 12:54 AM, Jason Schiller <jschiller at google.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Looks like early Thurs 2/16 has the best attendance.
> >> > 12 yes, and 3 no.
> >> > Voting members:
> >> > AFRINIC: 1v
> >> > APNIC: 1v
> >> > ARIN: 2v
> >> > LACNIC: 2v
> >> > RIPE: 1v
> >> >
> >> > I think we need to discuss quorum and voting rules.
> >> >
> >> > If we conclude that 10 members are eligible to make decisions at this
> meeting, then we do not have enough people available to make any
> decisions.  I think it would be hard (and improper) to claim people not
> attending the call are not eligible.
> >> >
> >> > We can try and advance the procedures on list, but I'm not sure how
> best to do that.  So far there seems to be two outstanding discussion items
> in the text that currently exists:
> >> >
> >> > 1. use of PTI Review Committee vs IANA Review Committee.
> >> >    Note: Oct 4 announcement calls it "IANA Numbering Services Review
> Committee"
> >> >    Note: It also lists Fiona Asonga and Dr. Ajay Kumar as members.
> >> >    https://www.nro.net/iana-numbering-services-review-
> committee-composition/
> >> >
> >> >    Note: Our charter calls it "IANA Numbering Services Review
> Committee"
> >> >    https://www.nro.net/final-version-iana-numbering-
> services-review-committee-charter/
> >> >
> >> >    Can we close the loop on this with an email vote?
> >> >      A. PTI Review Committee:
> >> >
> >> >      B. IANA Numbering Services Review Committee:
> >> >
> >> >      C. IANA Review Committee:
> >> >
> >> >      D. I don't care what we call it:
> >> >          Jason Schiller - ARIN
> >> >
> >> >      E. I abstain
> >> >
> >> > 2. There is an open question about if "all meetings will be conducted
> by teleconference" as stated in the charter.
> >> >     There is no text under "meetings" at all at this point.
> >> >     Nicolas thinks a face to face meeting might be needed to sum up
> reports prior to community presentation.
> >> >     Nicolas questions if we can change this, and if it requires a
> charter change.
> >> >     Jason suggests we should make good procedures (with the charter
> in mind) and if we need to change the
> >> >      charter to have good procedures then we look into that.
> >> >    Jason suggested possible middle ground:
> >> >       "all meetings will be available by teleconference for public
> oversight, and participation by RC members,
> >> >        observers, and invited guests."
> >> >    Jason also asked if there is a possible need for private meetings
> like when censuring a member.
> >> >
> >> >   Thoughts on meeting procedures?
> >> >
> >> >  3. Any objections on the text written so far?  If not, can we
> consider that part done (for now) and work on filling our the rest of the
> document?  (I can't tell is silence is acceptance) We will of course have a
> second look once complete and we ratify the document.
> >> >
> >> > 4. EMPTY SECTIONS:
> >> >
> >> > 3. Composition
> >> >       3.1 selection
> >> >       3.2  term
> >> >       3.3 removal
> >> > 4. Meetings
> >> > 5. Amendments
> >> >
> >> > ___Jason
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:28 PM, German Valdez <german at apnic.net>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for the input received so far.
> >> >
> >> > We are still missing 4 members to submit their preference. Please do
> it at your earliest convenience.
> >> >
> >> > Bear in mind that IANA RC teleconferences are open for the public so
> advance notice is always welcome.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > German
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On 31 Jan 2017, at 12:30 AM, German Valdez <german at apnic.net>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Dear Colleagues
> >> > >
> >> > > Here is my proposal to organise the first teleconference for the
> IANA Review Committee.
> >> > >
> >> > > Given that we have representatives from all RIR regions I’d like to
> propose the options of 11:00 AM or 12:00 PM UTC. This is based on
> experience in dealing with such diverse groups. This would allow IANA RC
> members in California currently in -8 UTC and representatives in Australia
> currently in +10 UTC be able to join the call in a not so terrible time of
> the day.
> >> > >
> >> > > I’m including two weeks in the poll, 6 - 10 and 13 - 17 of February
> >> > >
> >> > > In order to have enough time to advise the time and date of the
> teleconference please complete this poll by Thursday February 2nd. I’d
> announce and send the details of the call based on the most suitable time
> for the majority of the IANA RC members.
> >> > >
> >> > > http://doodle.com/poll/hhzep4qz57vdrgc7
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > >
> >> > > German Valdez_______________________________________________
> >> > > Rc mailing list
> >> > > Rc at nro.net
> >> > > https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Rc mailing list
> >> > Rc at nro.net
> >> > https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > _______________________________________________________
> >> > Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________________
> >> Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rc mailing list
> > Rc at nro.net
> > https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rc mailing list
> Rc at nro.net
> https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/rc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://nro.net/pipermail/rc/attachments/20170202/d3c48fe6/attachment.html>


More information about the Rc mailing list