[NRO-IANAXFER] Budget review?

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Mon Jan 12 18:16:03 CET 2015


Dear Colleagues,


The CRISP Team would like to highlight that RIRs' contribution to ICANN
and its fees to be paid as a part of the contract for the IANA operator
should be treated and considered separately.

Regarding the fees associated with the contract with the IANA operator
on the number resources, the CRISP Team plans to describe basic
principles about this, while not specifying a specific amount.


Best Regards,
Izumi Okutani
The CRISP Team



On 2015/01/12 18:33, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> Thank you Seun for your question about Budget review and to John for
> sharing the current situation.
> 
> This is being discussed within the CRISP Team.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Izumi Okutani
> The CRISP Team
> 
> 
> On 2015/01/11 23:07, John Curran wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Seun Ojedeji 
>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hello Izumi, CRISP team
>>
>> I observed there is no section talking about budget review in the 
>> second draft. I understand 800k+USD is contributed annually to ICANN 
>> by all RIRs, may I know if ICANN presents annual budget specifically 
>> for this contribution? If yes who does the review? If no then I 
>> suggest it be incorporated in our proposal and I think it's something 
>> NRO NC can do (yeah yeah I know I may hear the policy vis operation 
>> separation thing again.... Sign. :-) )
>>
>> Sean -
>>
>>     I have no position with respect to inclusion (or not) of budget 
>> review in the
>>     proposal.   For information sake, I will note that presently the 
>> RIRs make
>>     a voluntary $823,000 contribution annually to ICANN.  To the best 
>> of my
>>     knowledge, there is no budget specifically associated with that 
>> contribution,
>>     although the RIRs are invited to participate in  ICANN���������s 
>> annual budget
>>     development process.
>>
>>     Note also that, in addition to ICANN���������s role as the IANA 
>> operator, ICANN
>>     does have a declared mission which includes coordination of the 
>> Internet���������s
>>     systems of unique identifiers; i.e. via ICANN, the RIR community 
>> does gain
>>     some benefits from the ability to interact and coordinate with 
>> other parties
>>     on matters of mutual interest which may affect the Internet number 
>> registry
>>     system.   An example of such coordination includes the 
>> presentation and
>>     discussions with ICANN���������s various constituencies, including 
>> ALAC, GAC,
>>     etc.   Even if the RIR community were to seek another IANA 
>> operator at
>>     some future point, it would be necessary to review the benefits 
>> (unrelated
>>     to the IANA) from participating in ICANN, determine an appropriate 
>> path
>>     going forward and the appropriate level of contribution involved.
>>
>> I hope the above information aids in discussion of this topic,
>> /John
>>
>> John Curran
>> President and CEO
>> ARIN
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer




More information about the ianaxfer mailing list