[NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Mon Jan 12 10:20:47 CET 2015
Thank you for clarifying this and extremely helpful that you've shared
this promptly. This point is being discussed within the CRISP Team.
The CRISP Team
On 2015/01/11 6:15, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> Hello Seun,
>>>> Perhaps it would make sense to add something about each RIR developing
>>>> their own mechanism for selecting Review Committee members.
>>> I think the review committee membership requirement should be uniform and
>>> the selection process be uniform too.
>> Let me bring this up to the CRISP Team.
>> For the CRISP Team to be able to made adequate considerations, would you
>> be able to share what is the concern you are trying to address by adding
> The major reason is because i presume this is going to be a standing
> committee and it will make a procedural sense to have a standard process,
> this will especially be useful for subsequent members of the committee
> (after the first set). The other reason is that having a uniform process
> could ensure significant level of confidence in the global community about
> members representing each region.
>> Best Regards,
>> Izumi Okutani
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer at nro.net
More information about the ianaxfer