[NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Fri Jan 9 20:29:20 CET 2015
+1~ and just to add, because there were little contribution does not mean
absence of bottom up process.
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Jan 2015 15:17, "Hans Petter Holen" <hph at oslo.net> wrote:
> On 08.01.15 18.03, Richard Hill wrote:
>> While the RIR processes are indeed bottom up, there wasn't much bottom up
>> this particular process, not because of the process, but because there
>> weren't that many inputs from the bottom.
> I do not agree with this, this issue has been discussed over a long period
> of time, at multiple meetings and on multiple lists.
>> The RIRs did try to stimulate
>> inputs, going so far as to send out surveys, but there weren't that many
>> responses. So I think that the opening section of VI should reflect that.
> The RIR staff - as they normally do - summarized the positions and
> presented them to their communities at their most recent meeting.
> As there were no objections to this we have consensus and we acted on this
> by appointing the CRISP team to finalize.
> So I do not agree that there was not much bottom up in this particular
> Hans Petter Holen
> Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ianaxfer