[NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Jan 9 17:50:10 CET 2015
On 9 Jan 2015, at 16:27, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the process was bottom-up and was inline with the long established open and transparent RIR decision making processes.
> If there is concern about the number of posts made in this list, that is a different matter.
> There might be several reasons for that and should not be taken as an indication of lack of participation either.
> Part of it may be because people were in agreement and did not feel the need to raise objections or they have provided their input in their local RIR lists or fora and they did not need to raise it here again because they know CRISP team was tracking them too.
+1 on this too.
If the outcome of the CRISP team's deliberations were unsatisfactory, I am sure the RIR communities would have been far from silent about expressing their unhappiness.
More information about the ianaxfer