[NRO-IANAXFER] Status on Comments received
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 07:47:26 CET 2015
As expected, thanks to you and the CRISP team for creating a less
controversial proposal that only require minor comments from the community.
;-). Speaking about minor comments, there are 2 items that I commented
about which I am yet to read update on:
- Accordingly to the editorial version released i noticed the first
paragraph of section 3 has been removed as suggested. However I also
noticed it was then placed in section 2. While I agree that section 2 may
be an ideal place to insert such paragraph may I know if you are
considering any rewording as I had initially commented that the paragraph
seem to be a contradiction (English language is not my mother tongue :-) )
- I made a suggestion on minor changes on the gPDP, may I also know what
the crisp has determined about that?
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 30 Dec 2014 06:51, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> FYI. Attached is the current status of the issues recognized and under
> discussions by CRISP Team. We plan to post this on the NRO website as well.
> The current list does not reflect comments posted after 26th Dec.
> However, all issues posted are being brought up to CRISP Team's mailing
> list for attention to be discussed, including those posted after 27th Dec.
> If you any of your comments posted before 26th Dec is not reflected on
> the list, please let us know.
> Best Regards,
> Izumi Okutani
> CRISP Team
> On 2014/12/24 1:35, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > This is very useful way of engaging the community. We look forward to
> > further information.
> > Thanks for the update!
> > Cheers!
> > sent from Google nexus 4
> > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> > On 23 Dec 2014 16:46, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> >> Dear Colleagues,
> >> Thank you to all who have made comments about the initial draft proposal
> >> CRISP Team published on 18th Dec.
> >> On the 5th call, CRISP Team had discussions on how we work to consider
> >> and incorporate comments received.
> >> We are currently working on to capture the different issues raised on
> >> the mailing list and in the process of considering comments. So far, we
> >> discussed about IPR issue which I am happy to see discussions are
> >> continuing on this list.
> >> Once ready, we plan to share a list of issues CRISP Team capture of on
> >> this mailing list and CRISP Team's status, so that you are able to
> >> confirm the status of our work regarding your comments.
> >> I hope this clarifies our status on the comments received.
> >> We very much appreciate all the feedback you have given us.
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Izumi Okutani
> >> CRISP Team Chair
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ianaxfer mailing list
> >> ianaxfer at nro.net
> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ianaxfer