[NRO-IANAXFER] Contract details
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Wed Dec 31 20:58:31 CET 2014
It's few hours to 2015 here in Nigeria and I just like to quickly mention
this in 2014; the transition is what we are doing, so we have to be
specific on what we require as a feature, what the legal team should do is
merely wording of the contract to meet our feature requirement. It is NOT
the role of legal team determine duration of contract, neither are they to
determine termination conditions. That is the role of the community and
it's our call in this process.
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 31 Dec 2014 14:07, "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> Some suggestions have been made about the duration of the proposed
> contract between the RIRs and the IANA Operator, and about other details
> related to the proposed contract.
> In the view of the CRISP Team, the contract should be drawn up by the
> RIRs' legal teams, and it is not appropriate for the CRISP Team's response
> to the ICG RFP to go into much detail about the content of the contract.
> We suggest that, at an appropriate time in the future, the relevant legal
> teams should include the following considerations in the contract:
> - whether the contract should be for a fixed or indefinite term;
> - how renewal should be handled;
> - conditions that may trigger termination;
> - provisions for a smooth and orderly transition to a different
> operator in the future, including transfer of relevant assets;
> - the possibility that different parts of the IANA function may
> be transitioned to different operators in the future.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ianaxfer