[NRO-IANAXFER] NRO-NC role in Review Committee

[Izumi Okutani]

Noted, thank you Mwendwa for sharing this.

I saw Alan has already posted comments on the IANAXFER list, along with
other issues he has volunteered to take the lead. Thank you Alan.


Regards,
Izumi

On 2014/12/31 23:11, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
> Thank you Izumi,
> 
> I believe the same process used to select NRO NC should be used to
> select the Review Committee members since this is an acceptable and
> proven method used by all RIRs.
> 
> Regards
> 
> On 31/12/2014, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> Thank you Alan for working on this at this time of the year.
>>
>> The summary looks consistent with what we discussed at the 6th call and
>> the current state to me.
>>
>> Regarding the last point:
>>
>> The CRISP Team
>>> has not discussed how many members the Review Committee might have, or
>>> what procedure the NRO EC might follow in choosing the members.
>>
>> I'd like to suggest we discuss the details below in the next CRISP Team
>> call (7th call) on 2nd Jan, including whether such details should be
>> included in the proposal to be submitted to ICG.
>>
>> I'll leave it to Alan whether to add in your explanation to IANAXFER
>> list, that CRISP Team is planning to discuss it in the coming call -
>> it's also fine without it.
>>
>> Mwendwa, in relation to the point you made in this thread, if there are
>> any other points you feel we should discuss, your feedback would be very
>> welcome, so please let us know.
>>
>> Lastly, since details of Review Committee is a point mentioned in
>> JPNIC's comment, I would feel more comfortable if someone else could
>> lead & coordinate discussions related to this issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>> On 2014/12/31 22:00, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review Committee"
>>> proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the NRO-NC, or
>>> alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be co-opted to serve
>>> on the Review Committee.
>>>
>>> The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the operational
>>> performance review process independent of the policy development
>>> process.  Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role in global policy
>>> development, we think that the proposed Review Committee should be
>>> independent of the NRO-NC.
>>>
>>> The draft proposal says "The NRO Executive Council shall establish a
>>> Review Committee that will advise and assist the NRO Executive Council
>>> in its periodic review. Any such Review Committee should be a team
>>> composed of representatives from each RIR region ...". The CRISP Team
>>> has not discussed how many members the Review Committee might have, or
>>> what procedure the NRO EC might follow in choosing the members.
>>>
>>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
> 
>