[NRO-IANAXFER] Draft proposal differences

[Izumi Okutani]

Dear Seun,


Thank you for raising this. I hope the current status of consideration
by CRISP team regarding your requests are clear from my replies.

> My hope is that the CRISP team will endeavour to interact with this
> community and not just with themselves.

Very good point and I agree.

If there is anything else which is still not clear about CRISP Team
status, please let us know.


Regards,
Izumi Okutani
CRISP Team Chair


(2014/12/23 22:59), Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Dear Chair CRISP,
> 
> I sent the mail below 3days ago, relating to operational matters of CRISP,
> I did not get an acknowledgement, neither have i received any response
> indicating what step have been taken to address my concern OR if there are
> existing measures put in place initially do kindly let me know what it is.
> 
> On a related note, i also sent in another request today which is also
> pending your response.
> 
> My hope is that the CRISP team will endeavour to interact with this
> community and not just with themselves.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Dear crisp team,
>>
>> Thanks for all the effort so far, I just like to point a minor issue; I
>> have seen 2 different urls to the draft proposal the one sent during the
>> formal announcement and the one below:
>> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/CRISP-IANA-PROPOSAL-First-Draft1.pdf
>>
>> So in future and in order to avoid confusion since the  document is not in
>> redline format, I will suggest you endeavor to maintain a single url and
>> try to indicate in the document what draft version is being presented.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>