[NRO-IANAXFER] Draft proposal differences
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 17:17:48 CET 2014
Thanks for your response and for the update. I have not been able to access
the last meeting recording which brings me to refer you to the concern I
raised to you about recording format (mail subject: "access to recordings").
Could you kindly provide update on that as well?
Thanks for leadership so far.
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 23 Dec 2014 16:57, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> Dear Seun,
> Thank you for your comment on version control of proposals, to avoid
> confusions on the latest draft.
> This is good point, and was indeed discussed at the 5th call of CRISP
> Team on 22nd Dec.
> It is partially addressed as you can see from the NRO website which
> identifies and marks outdated and latest drafts.
> We are still working on keeping proposal versions and do plan to do this
> as well.
> (2014/12/20 14:35), Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > Dear crisp team,
> > Thanks for all the effort so far, I just like to point a minor issue; I
> > have seen 2 different urls to the draft proposal the one sent during the
> > formal announcement and the one below:
> > So in future and in order to avoid confusion since the document is not
> > redline format, I will suggest you endeavor to maintain a single url and
> > try to indicate in the document what draft version is being presented.
> > Regards
> > sent from Google nexus 4
> > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> > _______________________________________________
> > ianaxfer mailing list
> > ianaxfer at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ianaxfer