[NRO-IANAXFER] IANA policy vis IANA operation - How they differ?

Hans Petter Holen hph at oslo.net
Tue Dec 23 12:26:14 CET 2014


I do support the point of using existing structures and not create new. 

As far as I can remember this was the clear consensus at the last RIPE meeting. 

Hans Petter

On 23 December 2014 09:34:33 CET, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I have been following various discussions in this process (including
>beyond
>this commuity) where some are of the opinion that policy should be
>separate
>from operation. While i also agree with that, but they then go further
>to
>apply same separation to the community. This is where i think perhaps
>we
>need to get a clear rationale for that distinction.  Here is what i
>think:
>
>- Within the context of IANA operations (down to RIR level) policies
>has
>always been separated from its implementation (operations) by process
>- The processes are executed by 2 main sections of the community, the
>staff
>and the non-staff members
>- By process staff is largely assigned operations (IANA implementation)
>- By process the non-staff members of the community are largely
>assigned
>the policy development
>
>However we would agree that staff participate in PDP because they are
>by
>process part of the community and their participation is important. I
>then
>don't understand the rationale behind trying to say NRO-NC (for
>instance)
>would not be the ideal team to follow-up with staff operations at
>community
>level, infact i think they will be in a better position to do the job.
>I
>think it will only the fine to select other representative from the
>community if the current work of the NRO NC is already recognised to be
>significantly enormous (which is not the case in this situation).
>
>Inview of this, i will like to suggest that CRISP team strongly
>consider
>utilising existing structures effectively instead of creating new ones.
>We
>have 15 members of NRO-NC but we also know that global policies are not
>something that happen often....also the ASO(NRO-NC) in this particular
>case
>are the ones involved with ICANN and they would be more informed and
>know
>better on the operations processes.
>
>It will be good to know what aspect of this that i may have missed,
>otherwise i think maximising the current systems would go a long way in
>our
>global resource utilisation.
>
>Thanks
>-- 
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:     
>http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
><http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
><http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
><seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
>The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>ianaxfer mailing list
>ianaxfer at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/attachments/20141223/80eb8908/attachment.html>


More information about the ianaxfer mailing list