[Iana-ipr] Proposed Process for Executing Agreements

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 22:01:19 CEST 2016


Alan is correct.  That is exactly why 7.9 is there.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:

> Ray, Sam, does signing in parallel work for you? If so, and if we hear
> back from you before Wednesday’s call, I think we can cancel the call since
> this is the main item we would need to discuss. Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
> > On Sep 27, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 27 Sep 2016, at 22:13, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I haven't seen any responses to this, so I'm curious how this is being
> handled.
> >>
> >> In the interests of time, it might make sense to sign in counterparts
> (i.e., each signatory signs on its own sheet of paper), rather than in
> sequence.  This will be legally effective.  Signatories can always execute
> on a single document later on, for posterity.  (In other words, this should
> be signed in parallel, rather than serially.)
> >
> > I agree with signing in parallel.  The documents explicitly allow this;
> for example, clause 7.9 of the Commuity Agreement says:
> >
> > 7.9       Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in two or more
> counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall
> constitute together the same document.
> >
> > Alan Barrett
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > Iana-ipr at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160927/8096f1ae/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list