[Iana-ipr] PDF document for review

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Mon Mar 21 13:42:31 CET 2016


Hi,

We said 3 weeks in our meeting, so that was the date I gave the IETF counsel.  

-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On Mar 21, 2016, at 07:59, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Andrew, Thanks Alan,
> 
> Do you have an ETA for the reviewed documents in order for us to make the best decision on the way forward here?
> 
> Jonathan & Lise
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Barrett [mailto:alan.barrett at afrinic.net] 
> Sent: 18 March 2016 18:18
> To: iana-ipr at nro.net
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] PDF document for review
> 
> 
>> On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:02, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:
>> 
>> Alan / Andrew,
>> 
>> Lise & I were seeking to be efficient rather that slow things down. 
>> The concern is that three parallel reviews produce three outcomes 
>> which may not gel together or even contradict one another.
>> 
>> Therefore, it seemed logical to get one (or two as it turns out) 
>> reviews completed prior so that the following one/s build on that 
>> rather than potentially conflict with it.
>> 
>> Trust that makes sense?
> 
> No, sorry, I can’t think of a scenario where reviews in series will result in less overall effort than reviews in parallel.  It’s too late anyway; the reviews are already proceeding in parallel.
> 
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr



More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list