[Iana-ipr] PDF document for review
jrobinson at afilias.info
Mon Mar 21 12:59:01 CET 2016
Thanks Andrew, Thanks Alan,
Do you have an ETA for the reviewed documents in order for us to make the best decision on the way forward here?
Jonathan & Lise
From: Alan Barrett [mailto:alan.barrett at afrinic.net]
Sent: 18 March 2016 18:18
To: iana-ipr at nro.net
Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] PDF document for review
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:02, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:
> Alan / Andrew,
> Lise & I were seeking to be efficient rather that slow things down.
> The concern is that three parallel reviews produce three outcomes
> which may not gel together or even contradict one another.
> Therefore, it seemed logical to get one (or two as it turns out)
> reviews completed prior so that the following one/s build on that
> rather than potentially conflict with it.
> Trust that makes sense?
No, sorry, I can’t think of a scenario where reviews in series will result in less overall effort than reviews in parallel. It’s too late anyway; the reviews are already proceeding in parallel.
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr at nro.net
More information about the Iana-ipr