[Iana-ipr] PDF document for review

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Fri Mar 18 14:05:53 CET 2016


It makes sense to me, yes, but I think we face the conflict potential regardless.  If our counsel thinks there's a problem and yours doesn't, we'll need to reconcile that anyway, right?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 04:02, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:
> 
> Alan / Andrew,
> 
> Lise & I were seeking to be efficient rather that slow things down. The
> concern is that three parallel reviews produce three outcomes which may not
> gel together or even contradict one another.
> 
> Therefore, it seemed logical to get one (or two as it turns out) reviews
> completed prior so that the following one/s build on that rather than
> potentially conflict with it.
> 
> Trust that makes sense?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com] 
> Sent: 17 March 2016 20:38
> To: Lise Fuhr <Fuhr at etno.eu>
> Cc: iana-ipr at nro.net
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] PDF document for review
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:08:17PM +0000, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>> 
>> I hope you all had a safe travel home. I have discussed the process with
> Jonathan regarding the document. We propose to have a sequential review by
> our legal counsellors instead of the parallel reviews to avoid any
> overlapping work. If any of you have comments already from your advisors it
> would be good to share with the group so we can pass on the comments to our
> advisors. If you haven't sent them yet, we are happy to be the first to send
> to our advisors. Please get back to Jonathan and me if you have any concerns
> or questions regarding this procedure.
> 
> Like Alan (downthread), I already requested the IETF counsel have a look at
> this.  So at least two of us are already doing this in parallel :)  But
> also, I think trying to do this serially will result in a much longer
> timeline, and I don't know that we have 6 additional weeks to spare.  I'd
> like to get this out to the community real soon.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> 



More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list