[Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 15:27:22 CET 2016


Is today at 16:00 or 16:30?

Greg

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
wrote:

> All,
>
> I cannot make the 16h30 today. Apologies.
>
> I can make 13h00 Wed and plan to do so. Could we condense into a single
> meeting?
>
> In any event, my suggestions on logistics:
>
> - Perhaps we should try to set in place a sequence of meetings (as
> required)
> so that we have the time pre-committed and avoid the need for frequent
> polls.
> - Also, it may be good to set out the scope of work and some timelines for
> the milestones derived from that
>
> I suspect that the above is all second nature to this group so forgive me
> if
> so.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nurani Nimpuno [mailto:nurani at netnod.se]
> Sent: 06 March 2016 22:52
> To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
> Cc: iana-ipr at nro.net; Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Meeting in ICANN 55
>
> works for me too.
> Nurani
>
>
>
> > On 06 Mar 2016, at 13:01, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Those times work for me and are now in my calendar.
> >
> > jari
> >
> > On 06 Mar 2016, at 11:52, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> >
> >>> In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday
> >>> and
> >>> 13:00 Wed.
> >> Works for me.
> >>
> >> Izumi
> >>
> >>> On 2016/03/06 20:43, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 06:35:34AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
> >>>> I am free at 16:30 Monday until Public Forum starts at 17:00ish.
> >>>> If need be, I can leave the (non-critical) session prior to that so
> >>>> we can start at 16:00.
> >>>>
> >>>> I can do 13:00 Wednesday for 30 minutes, then I have to go to GNSO
> Council.
> >>>> (Though not on Council, as a Chair of a GNSO subgroup I need to be
> >>>> there)
> >>>
> >>> In that case, I propose we plan two 30 minute shots, 16:30 Monday
> >>> and
> >>> 13:00 Wed.  We'll get some of everyone.  I think we should avoid any
> >>> status discussion and nail down these open issues:
> >>>
> >>> 1.  Precisely what we want to do about the domain name controls stuff.
> >>> I think we have at least 3 commercial entities who do this sort of
> >>> thing, so let's nail down for sure the requirements and put them in
> >>> the doc; then we can ask the implementers to put those requirements
> >>> to bid.
> >>>
> >>> 2.  Exactly how we're going to solve the Trust-duty-to-enforce and
> >>> the community-decides tension.  I think we need to work out language
> >>> for the proposal.
> >>>
> >>> I _think_ those are the only things outstanding, and we can then (1)
> >>> take to the respective communities, "Here's what we think is final,"
> >>> and (2) send to lawyers for implementation.
> >>>
> >>> Does that ssound like a plan?  If so, I'll try to find a place for
> >>> us to meet.
> >>>
> >>> A
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Iana-ipr mailing list
> >> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > Iana-ipr at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160307/1af18561/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list