[Iana-ipr] What's going into PTI?

Paul Wilson pwilson at apnic.net
Sun Mar 6 21:54:44 CET 2016


Pacific Telecommunication Council. 

But that was an autocorrected "PTI". 

Sorry! 


On 6 March 2016 8:51:25 pm GMT+00:00, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>What does "PTC" stand for?
>
>
>On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
>
>> Our assumption is that ICANN will subcontract the Iana number
>functions to
>> PTI. So PTC staff will be doing the work.
>> Paul
>>
>> On 6 March 2016 8:15:54 pm GMT+00:00, Greg Shatan
><gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm curious to know the understanding of the RIRs and IETF about
>what is
>>> going into PTI.  The ICANN Budget just posted for comment shows only
>the
>>> "naming functions" going into PTI, while the "numbers functions" and
>>> "protocol parameter functions" will remain within ICANN.
>>>
>>> Since IANA staff is cross-functional, this means that the IANA staff
>will
>>> be allocated in part to ICANN and in part to PTI based on what they
>do
>>> (e.g., employee A will be 30% PTI, 70% ICANN and employee B will be
>50%
>>> PTI, 70% ICANN). As such, PTI would almost certainly have no
>full-time
>>> employees.
>>>
>>> Is this your understanding of the plan?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Paul Wilson
>> Director General, APNIC
>>

-- 
Paul Wilson
Director General, APNIC 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160306/a24cb787/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list