[Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 16:59:11 CEST 2016


Filled out the Doodle.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
wrote:

> Greg,
>
>
>
> Please can you fill in your ability asap.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 15 June 2016 17:25
> *To:* German Valdez <german at nro.net>
> *Cc:* iana-ipr at nro.net; Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual
> Property Agreements
>
>
>
> 8 am UTC is 4 am New York time. That is really bad for me, as I have an
> early meeting on Monday and thus no chance to recover by sleeping in a
> bit.  Can we find a time that is more mutually comfortable?
>
>
>
> Greg
>
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016, German Valdez <german at nro.net> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Based on previous agreement on representation:
>
> * Greg Shatan
> * One or both of Lise Fuhr or Jonathan Robinson (CWG)
> * One or both of Alan Barrett or Paul Wilson (NRO)
> * One or both of Izumi Okutani or Nurani Nimpuno (CRISP)
> * One or both of Andrew Sullivan (IAB) or Jari Arkko (IETF)
>
> So far we have Monday June 20th 8:00 AM UTC where all OC are represented,
> pending confirmation from Greg
>
> As soon as we complete all parties i’ll send the webex details
>
> German
>
>
>
> > On 14 Jun 2016, at 9:30 PM, German Valdez <german at nro.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please complete the below poll at your earliest convenience
> >
> > http://doodle.com/poll/g99cu7sxqn6mnf78
> >
> > As per previous agreement the common time we need is with at least one
> representative from each OC plus Greg
> >
> > regards
> >
> > German
> >
> >> On 14 Jun 2016, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:57:06PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> >>> It's my understanding that IETF's counsel has not yet completed its
> review
> >>> of the Proposed Principal Terms document.
> >>
> >> Nope, I sent something to the list some while ago saying the Trust
> >> said it was ok with it.
> >>
> >>> When does IETF expect to receive
> >>> counsel's review and circulate it to this group?
> >>
> >> We don't expect to circulate it to this group.  That's a review
> >> delivered to the Trust so the Trust could decide what to do.
> >>
> >>> Also, has the IETF or
> >>> IETF's counsel seen Sidley's mark-up yet (and if so, when can we
> expect to
> >>> hear back about it)?
> >>
> >> I have circulated it, yes.  I'll poke again.
> >>
> >>> Without these steps, it doesn't seem that the IETF can be ready to
> >>> negotiate the agreement(s)
> >>
> >> Why?  We're ready to instruct our counsel to go negotiate based on
> >> this set of principles.
> >>
> >> A
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Sullivan
> >> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Iana-ipr mailing list
> >> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160616/f8be9214/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list