[Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements

Jonathan Robinson jrobinson at afilias.info
Thu Jun 16 11:17:12 CEST 2016



Please can you fill in your ability asap.






From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com] 
Sent: 15 June 2016 17:25
To: German Valdez <german at nro.net>
Cc: iana-ipr at nro.net; Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements


8 am UTC is 4 am New York time. That is really bad for me, as I have an early meeting on Monday and thus no chance to recover by sleeping in a bit.  Can we find a time that is more mutually comfortable?



On Wednesday, June 15, 2016, German Valdez <german at nro.net <mailto:german at nro.net> > wrote:


Based on previous agreement on representation:

* Greg Shatan
* One or both of Lise Fuhr or Jonathan Robinson (CWG)
* One or both of Alan Barrett or Paul Wilson (NRO)
* One or both of Izumi Okutani or Nurani Nimpuno (CRISP)
* One or both of Andrew Sullivan (IAB) or Jari Arkko (IETF)

So far we have Monday June 20th 8:00 AM UTC where all OC are represented, pending confirmation from Greg

As soon as we complete all parties i’ll send the webex details


> On 14 Jun 2016, at 9:30 PM, German Valdez <german at nro.net <javascript:;> > wrote:
> Hi
> Please complete the below poll at your earliest convenience
> http://doodle.com/poll/g99cu7sxqn6mnf78
> As per previous agreement the common time we need is with at least one representative from each OC plus Greg
> regards
> German
>> On 14 Jun 2016, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;> > wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:57:06PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>> It's my understanding that IETF's counsel has not yet completed its review
>>> of the Proposed Principal Terms document.
>> Nope, I sent something to the list some while ago saying the Trust
>> said it was ok with it.
>>> When does IETF expect to receive
>>> counsel's review and circulate it to this group?
>> We don't expect to circulate it to this group.  That's a review
>> delivered to the Trust so the Trust could decide what to do.
>>> Also, has the IETF or
>>> IETF's counsel seen Sidley's mark-up yet (and if so, when can we expect to
>>> hear back about it)?
>> I have circulated it, yes.  I'll poke again.
>>> Without these steps, it doesn't seem that the IETF can be ready to
>>> negotiate the agreement(s)
>> Why?  We're ready to instruct our counsel to go negotiate based on
>> this set of principles.
>> A
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net <javascript:;> 
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160616/9c6bac99/attachment.html>

More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list