[Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements
german at nro.net
Tue Jun 14 13:30:03 CEST 2016
Please complete the below poll at your earliest convenience
As per previous agreement the common time we need is with at least one representative from each OC plus Greg
> On 14 Jun 2016, at 1:27 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:57:06PM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> It's my understanding that IETF's counsel has not yet completed its review
>> of the Proposed Principal Terms document.
> Nope, I sent something to the list some while ago saying the Trust
> said it was ok with it.
>> When does IETF expect to receive
>> counsel's review and circulate it to this group?
> We don't expect to circulate it to this group. That's a review
> delivered to the Trust so the Trust could decide what to do.
>> Also, has the IETF or
>> IETF's counsel seen Sidley's mark-up yet (and if so, when can we expect to
>> hear back about it)?
> I have circulated it, yes. I'll poke again.
>> Without these steps, it doesn't seem that the IETF can be ready to
>> negotiate the agreement(s)
> Why? We're ready to instruct our counsel to go negotiate based on
> this set of principles.
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
More information about the Iana-ipr