[Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Tue Jun 14 04:41:57 CEST 2016


I agree Lise.

German, would you help us with setting a doodle poll and fixing the meeting time?
 From the numbers, it is not a must for me to join as long as Alan/Paul are available.

FYI, this is the progress I have shared with the CRISP Team on IPR Status:
https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2016-June/002528.html

Many thanks Andrew for the update from the IETF - I have updated to the CRISP Team that the IETF is ready.



Izumi


On 2016/06/14 1:43, Lise Fuhr wrote:
> Dear Izumi,
>
> Thank you for your reply. I have discussed it with Jonathan and Greg and we believe it would be good to have a call if possible this week or before the ICANN meeting in Helsinki. Maybe German Valdez could help us with setting up a Doodle poll with a relatively short response time so we ensure that Alan/Paul plus one from each of the other communities are present?
>
> Thank you.
> Best regards,
> Lise
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp]
> Sent: 13 June 2016 16:31
> To: Lise Fuhr; iana-ipr at nro.net
> Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements
>
> Dear Lise and all,
>
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. I think it's useful to confirm and share timelines per implementation steps, with only a few months to go to complete the imeplementation.
> I'm flexible this week, while at this stage, it would be important to confirm Alan/Paul's availabilities for update on legal advice.
>
>
> Regards,
> Izumi
>
> On 2016/06/09 16:32, Lise Fuhr wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> We sent this a week ago for your review and we think it would be good to have a call next week before the ICANN meeting in Helsinki. We would like to discuss the following issues:
>>
>>
>> 1.       The advice from the different legal advisors
>>
>> 2.       How to implement and process the advice
>>
>> How is your availability next week, and how far are you in getting legal advice on the document?
>>
>> Best,
>> Jonathan and Lise
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Lise Fuhr
>> Sent: 02 June 2016 15:27
>> To: iana-ipr at nro.net
>> Subject: Proposed Principal Terms of IANA Intellectual Property Agreements
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> The CWG first assumed that we would work in consecutive order with the IPR document and the legal advisors. We flagged this to this group, but since we apparently didn't receive any legal input from either of you (please bear with us if we are wrong and resend any input) we went ahead and asked for legal advice on the document. We got this advice very recently and are about to send it to the CWG for discussion. In order to keep you informed we enclose the preliminary response from our advisors including their questions. If you have any response from your advisors please share them with us in order to continue the dialogue.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jonathan and Lise
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>>
>




More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list