[Iana-ipr] ICANN participation in iana-ipr list

Jorge Contreras contreraslegal at att.net
Thu Jul 21 00:13:29 CEST 2016


Greg ­ just a point of clarification: the License Agreement that we
distributed runs from the Trust to PTI.

Jorge

From:  <iana-ipr-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of Greg Shatan
<gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Date:  Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 4:01 PM
To:  Ray Pelletier <rpelletier at isoc.org>
Cc:  <iana-ipr at nro.net>
Subject:  Re: [Iana-ipr] ICANN participation in iana-ipr list

> Ray,
> 
> Good point. I think it makes more sense to discuss the CA only among the
> parties to the CA (the operational communities and the Trust).
> 
> On the other hand, the operational community reps need to be part of the
> discussion of the license agreement (which I think will run to ICANN and not
> direct to PTI) and the IPR assignment.
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier at isoc.org> wrote:
>> Alan,
>> 
>> I asked ICANN about this and they confirmed this list below.
>> 
>> But let¹s discuss:
>> 
>> The Communities are discussing Agreements with the Trust,
>> the Community Agreement (CA) and the License Agreement to PTI.
>> 
>> The Trust is also discussing the IPR Assignment to the Trust.
>> And, of course, will need to discuss the License Agreement to the
>> PTI.
>> 
>> Is there clear desire on everyone¹s part that you¹d like to
>> invite ICANN to the CA discussion?
>> 
>> Ray
>> 
>> 
>>    Akram Atallah        akram.atallah at icann.org
>>    Sam Eisner           Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
>>    Trang Nguyen trang.nguyen at icann.org
>>    John Jeffrey         john.jeffrey at icann.org
>>    Elise Gerich         elise.gerich at icann.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> > On Jul 20, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > While we were discussion the draft principal terms document, we didn¹t
>>> have any ICANN representatives in the iana-ipr group.  Now that we are
>>> moving on to discussion the agreements, I think we should have some ICANN
>>> participation, including both legal and other staff.
>>> >
>>> > Who would be the right people?
>>> >
>>> > I¹d suggest that any ICANN people who want to be involved end a request to
>>> German Valdez <german at nro.net>.
>>> >
>>> > Alan Barrett
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Iana-ipr mailing list
>>> > Iana-ipr at nro.net
>>> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> 
> _______________________________________________ Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160720/5e2edc68/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list