[Iana-ipr] Agenda for 29 Feb

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Sat Feb 27 06:46:42 CET 2016


It might be good to talk about the new name of PTI.  Do we think we need to be explicit that whatever the name is, all services remain at iana.org?

-- 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums. 

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 23:47, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
> 
> Please suggest agenda items for the next call on 29 Feb 2016.
> 
> I see the following items in the notes from the previous meeting on 15 Feb:
> 
> 
> * Announcement to operational communities that they may view the draft in Google Docs at <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oR3nmHl1fK7BEWOBK65KyvnmhTJZX70j9q4Ne9i4ad4/edit?usp=sharing>.
> 
> * Tentative acceptance of non-controversial edits
> 
> * Edit the document to explicitly give ICANN the right to sublicense rights to PTI.
> 
> * Edit the document to say that the IETF Trust will be registrant and admin contact, and ICANN will be tech contact.  (Do we need to re-open that discussion, making ICANN only the tech contact and the Trust both registrar and admin contact?)
> 
> * Edit the document to outline the requirements for multiple approvals for any change.
> 
> * Edit the document to say that the IANA IPR Governance Council (“IIGC”) will have 3 representatives from each operational community.
> 
> * Edit the document to clarify that exclusive licences will be restricted to use of the IPR in connection with provision of the IANA functions.
> 
> * Edit the document to mention the cases of IANA registries not managed by ICANN, and non-IANA registries managed by the ICANN IANA department.
> 
> 
> Alan Barrett
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr



More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list