[Iana-ipr] Doodle Poll February 2016
jrobinson at afilias.info
Tue Feb 2 07:27:54 CET 2016
Hello Izumi & Colleagues,
A couple of points:
1. On quorum, it seems that for now at least, we must have Greg and either
Lise or myself.
2. Having spoken with Greg, he has a real challenge with the proposed time.
3. It will be most useful, and arguably a necessary precursor to a meeting,
if participants in this group can review and provide input to the current
That way, we can use the meeting to discuss the document and any input on
So, in summary, it seems that we do need to re-open / extend the poll and
provide input to the document in the interim
From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp]
Sent: 02 February 2016 02:12
To: German Valdez <german at nro.net>; iana-ipr at nro.net
Subject: Re: [Iana-ipr] Doodle Poll February 2016
1) Greg's attendance
I suggest to leave it to Greg, Jonathan, and Lise whether it is a must for
Greg to attend the next call, for efficient coordination with the names
For now, the call is scheduled as Wednesday February 3rd at 2100UTC, but
please raise it, if you see the need to reschedule the poll, when Greg can
2) Quorum requirements
To avoid the same situation as the last call - (i.e.,not everyone needed was
May we confirm who are the must to attend from each community?
For the numbers, at least one RIR, at least one CRISP. Our requirement is
covered for the coming call as scheduled.
3) Action Items
I think it would be good to confirm the agenda of the coming call.
Below are the remaining action items from the previous calls, from my
> - the protocols (Andrew/Jari) will provide written explanations on terms
which were highlighted to need further coordination:
> 1) Quality control
> 2) Change of IPR holder in case of not meeting the needs of the OCs
> 3) the IETF Trust can unilaterally terminate the agreement
In addition, we are waiting for feedback from RIRs on the Principal Terms.
Google doc shared by Greg:
I stop here it here, given my role is now an observer in the process.
On 2016/02/01 21:51, German Valdez wrote:
> Based on the input received so far may I propose to have the IPR
teleconference on Wednesday February 3rd at 9:00 PM UTC
> Unfortunately, at the suggested time Greg is not available. Jari has not
responded yet the poll
> Are the groups represented in the IPR ok to proceed or should we look for
an alternative time ?
> Looking forward to receiving your comments
>> On 28 Jan 2016, at 2:48 PM, German Valdez <german at nro.net> wrote:
>> Please complete the poll for next week teleconference
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
Iana-ipr mailing list
Iana-ipr at nro.net
More information about the Iana-ipr