[Iana-ipr] draft solicitation note

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 16:16:01 CEST 2016


I don't think the Principal Terms were put out for ICANN Public Comment
(though there were brought back to the CWG), so we'll need to be careful in
how we phrase that....

Greg

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:

> Thanks, looks good to me as well. The only thing that I wonder is whether
> the fact that there was earlier work and posting of principal terms should
> be mentioned. I know from the IETF community side that would probably be
> helpful context.
>
> Jari
>
> > On 8.8.2016, at 22.07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's a draft note for the solitication of public comments.  Have at it
> :)
> >
> > A
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Sullivan
> > ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> > <draft-pub-comment-solicit.20160808a-dist.txt>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iana-ipr mailing list
> > Iana-ipr at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-ipr mailing list
> Iana-ipr at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/iana-ipr/attachments/20160809/bf5fc7f5/attachment.html>


More information about the Iana-ipr mailing list