[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team

Janvier Noulaye jnoulaye at gmail.com
Thu May 19 13:29:54 CEST 2016


Thanks to Nurani & Izumi

Fine with me.

Janvier Ngnoulaye

2016-05-17 6:42 GMT+01:00 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:

> FYI.
>
> This is what Nurani and I had sent to Oscar Robles, the Chair of the NRO
> EC last Friday, regarding future of the CRISP Team.
> We are still waiting for response -  We'll consult the CRISP Team if
> anything notable comes up after we hear back from Oscar.
>
> Thanks to all who shared your views on this topic!
>
>
> Izumi
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:59 +0900
> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> To: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar at lacnic.net>, Nurani Nimpuno <
> nurani at netnod.se>
>
> Oscar,
>
>
> With discussions among two of us and the CRISP Team, this is our feedback.
>   - Agree there is no longer need for regular activity as the CRISP Team
>  - Support the suggestion to have clarity of the CRISP Team status
>  - It is also important to have clarity on how we handle a situation,
> while the probability of its needs is expected to be low, of a situation
> where feedback on consistency with the number community proposal is needed
> for implementation
>  - To address such situation, we would like to suggest the following:
>
> The CRISP Team reduces all activity to 0, and becomes dormant. In the
> event of community input on the IANA transition needed before September,
> the CRISP team will reactivate and respond within its charter. If there are
> no such events, until it will formally resolve upon the completion of the
> transition.
>
> We see very little cost in keeping it open, but dormant and seems to
> achieve the same effect as the suggestion by the NRO EC, about the clarity
> of the CRISP status.
> We have also considered the option of dissolving the CRISP Team and set up
> CRISP Team 2.0 with new members as needed, and in our view, a potential new
> CRISP 2.0 introduces new ambiguity at the very final stages of this process.
>
> We are open to any clarifications needed about our suggestion and am
> looking forward to your feedback.
> If you would like to have a call with us, we are open to coordinate the
> time and schedule next week as needed.
>
>
> Nurani & Izumi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20160519/e2dbce23/attachment.html>


More information about the CRISP mailing list