[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team

[Andrei Robachevsky]

+1

Andrei

Paul Rendek wrote on 17/05/16 19:03:
> Thanks,
> 
> ...a very positive and constructive mail.
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> On 17/05/16 16:48, Sweeting, John wrote:
>> Thanks Izumi
>>
>> On 5/17/16, 1:42 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
>> <crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI.
>>>
>>> This is what Nurani and I had sent to Oscar Robles, the Chair of the NRO
>>> EC last Friday, regarding future of the CRISP Team.
>>> We are still waiting for response -  We'll consult the CRISP Team if
>>> anything notable comes up after we hear back from Oscar.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all who shared your views on this topic!
>>>
>>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team
>>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:59 +0900
>>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>>> To: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar at lacnic.net>, Nurani Nimpuno
>>> <nurani at netnod.se>
>>>
>>> Oscar,
>>>
>>>
>>> With discussions among two of us and the CRISP Team, this is our feedback.
>>>
>>>  - Agree there is no longer need for regular activity as the CRISP Team
>>>  - Support the suggestion to have clarity of the CRISP Team status
>>>  - It is also important to have clarity on how we handle a situation,
>>> while the probability of its needs is expected to be low, of a situation
>>> where feedback on consistency with the number community proposal is
>>> needed for implementation
>>>  - To address such situation, we would like to suggest the following:
>>>
>>> The CRISP Team reduces all activity to 0, and becomes dormant. In the
>>> event of community input on the IANA transition needed before September,
>>> the CRISP team will reactivate and respond within its charter. If there
>>> are no such events, until it will formally resolve upon the completion of
>>> the transition.
>>>
>>> We see very little cost in keeping it open, but dormant and seems to
>>> achieve the same effect as the suggestion by the NRO EC, about the
>>> clarity of the CRISP status.
>>> We have also considered the option of dissolving the CRISP Team and set
>>> up CRISP Team 2.0 with new members as needed, and in our view, a
>>> potential new CRISP 2.0 introduces new ambiguity at the very final stages
>>> of this process.
>>>
>>> We are open to any clarifications needed about our suggestion and am
>>> looking forward to your feedback.
>>> If you would like to have a call with us, we are open to coordinate the
>>> time and schedule next week as needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nurani & Izumi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>