[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team

[Paul Rendek]

Thanks,

...a very positive and constructive mail.

Paul



On 17/05/16 16:48, Sweeting, John wrote:
> Thanks Izumi
>
> On 5/17/16, 1:42 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
> <crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> FYI.
>>
>> This is what Nurani and I had sent to Oscar Robles, the Chair of the NRO
>> EC last Friday, regarding future of the CRISP Team.
>> We are still waiting for response -  We'll consult the CRISP Team if
>> anything notable comes up after we hear back from Oscar.
>>
>> Thanks to all who shared your views on this topic!
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team
>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:59 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar at lacnic.net>, Nurani Nimpuno
>> <nurani at netnod.se>
>>
>> Oscar,
>>
>>
>> With discussions among two of us and the CRISP Team, this is our feedback.
>>
>>  - Agree there is no longer need for regular activity as the CRISP Team
>>  - Support the suggestion to have clarity of the CRISP Team status
>>  - It is also important to have clarity on how we handle a situation,
>> while the probability of its needs is expected to be low, of a situation
>> where feedback on consistency with the number community proposal is
>> needed for implementation
>>  - To address such situation, we would like to suggest the following:
>>
>> The CRISP Team reduces all activity to 0, and becomes dormant. In the
>> event of community input on the IANA transition needed before September,
>> the CRISP team will reactivate and respond within its charter. If there
>> are no such events, until it will formally resolve upon the completion of
>> the transition.
>>
>> We see very little cost in keeping it open, but dormant and seems to
>> achieve the same effect as the suggestion by the NRO EC, about the
>> clarity of the CRISP status.
>> We have also considered the option of dissolving the CRISP Team and set
>> up CRISP Team 2.0 with new members as needed, and in our view, a
>> potential new CRISP 2.0 introduces new ambiguity at the very final stages
>> of this process.
>>
>> We are open to any clarifications needed about our suggestion and am
>> looking forward to your feedback.
>> If you would like to have a call with us, we are open to coordinate the
>> time and schedule next week as needed.
>>
>>
>> Nurani & Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
> ________________________________
>
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>