[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team
Sweeting, John
john.sweeting at twcable.com
Tue May 17 16:48:42 CEST 2016
Thanks Izumi
On 5/17/16, 1:42 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
<crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>FYI.
>
>This is what Nurani and I had sent to Oscar Robles, the Chair of the NRO
>EC last Friday, regarding future of the CRISP Team.
>We are still waiting for response - We'll consult the CRISP Team if
>anything notable comes up after we hear back from Oscar.
>
>Thanks to all who shared your views on this topic!
>
>
>Izumi
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: Follow up: The Future of the CRISP Team
>Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:59 +0900
>From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>To: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar at lacnic.net>, Nurani Nimpuno
><nurani at netnod.se>
>
>Oscar,
>
>
>With discussions among two of us and the CRISP Team, this is our feedback.
>
> - Agree there is no longer need for regular activity as the CRISP Team
> - Support the suggestion to have clarity of the CRISP Team status
> - It is also important to have clarity on how we handle a situation,
>while the probability of its needs is expected to be low, of a situation
>where feedback on consistency with the number community proposal is
>needed for implementation
> - To address such situation, we would like to suggest the following:
>
>The CRISP Team reduces all activity to 0, and becomes dormant. In the
>event of community input on the IANA transition needed before September,
>the CRISP team will reactivate and respond within its charter. If there
>are no such events, until it will formally resolve upon the completion of
>the transition.
>
>We see very little cost in keeping it open, but dormant and seems to
>achieve the same effect as the suggestion by the NRO EC, about the
>clarity of the CRISP status.
>We have also considered the option of dissolving the CRISP Team and set
>up CRISP Team 2.0 with new members as needed, and in our view, a
>potential new CRISP 2.0 introduces new ambiguity at the very final stages
>of this process.
>
>We are open to any clarifications needed about our suggestion and am
>looking forward to your feedback.
>If you would like to have a call with us, we are open to coordinate the
>time and schedule next week as needed.
>
>
>Nurani & Izumi
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the CRISP
mailing list