[CRISP-TEAM] Draft mail: CRISP Team review of the Updated 4th Draft SLA for the IANA Numbering Services

Janvier Noulaye jnoulaye at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 18:57:05 CET 2016

Great !  Izumi & Nurani
I'm happy with the proposal.

Janvier Ngnoulaye

2016-03-02 13:04 GMT+01:00 Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se>:

> Dear CRISP team colleagues,
> Thank you all for your input on the 4th draft SLA.
> Please find below the draft mail to the global ianaxfer at nro.net list,
> summarising the CRISP team’s review of the latest draft SLA for the IANA
> Numbering Services.
> We ask for your feedback on this mail, and hope 36 hours is sufficient
> amount of time for your review.
> Could we ask you to provide your feedback or any comments you may have
> before 3 March 23:59?
> Thanks and kind regards,
> Izumi and Nurani
> ----------
> Dear Colleagues,
> The CRISP Team has reviewed the Updated 4th Draft SLA for the IANA
> Numbering Services.
> Updated 4th Draft SLA for the IANA Numbering Services
> https://www.nro.net/news/updated-4th-draft-sla-for-the-iana-numbering-services
> Firstly, we would like to thank both ICANN and RIRs for sharing all
> comments and updates on the SLA from its Third Draft in a continued
> transparent manner with Internet number community. It is our expectation
> that the completion of this SLA will continue to take place in such a
> transparent and open manner.
> We observe that the 4th Draft SLA is consistent with the number community
> proposal and we support the comments made by RIR staff in working towards a
> final SLA document, addressing the feedback received from ICANN.
> We have primarily reviewed whether the SLA sufficiently covers the
> following four key elements of the number community proposal.
> * Service level requirements of the IANA Numbering Services are clearly
> defined to meet the expectations of the RIRs and the Internet numbers
> community
> * The RIRs, and the Internet number Community through the Review Committee
> are able to conduct review of the service level, to ensure the service
> level is met in accordance with the SLA
> * The RIRs have the ability to terminate the SLA, while at the same time
> ensuring the stability of the IANA Numbering Services, in accordance with
> the number community proposal
> * The IPR and rights over data are transferred, in accordance with the
> number community proposal
> In particular, we support the NRO revisions numbered below, which are
> required to ensure consistency with the CRISP proposal. The previously
> proposed text, without the NRO revisions addressing ICANN’s feedback, would
> be inconsistent with the number community proposal as well as the final ICG
> proposal, and therefore not acceptable to the Internet number community.
> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Draft-SLA_v3-comments-ICANN-20160223.pdf
> Source 15: 8.1- Periodic Review
> Source 16: 8.2- Cooperation with review
> Source 17: 9- Failure to Perform
> Source 20: 10.3 Right not to renew
> Source 24: 11.1 - Submission of a plan  (* The RIR Lawyer Comment says
> 11.2.1 - could it be a typo?)
> Source 35: 11.2 - Transition to Successor Operator
> Source 26: 12.1 - Assignment of IPR and rights to Data
> In addition, we wish to remind the community that the SLA provides the
> Internet number community with its required accountability measures, which
> are clearly represented within the number community proposal; and it is
> therefore essential to the CRISP support for the IANA transition plan.
> The SLA will have no effect until the transition actually takes place on
> 30 September 2016, however it must be considered as an essential commitment
> along with other improvements to ICANN’s accountability. In particular the
> SLA should be executed or otherwise guaranteed, no later than the execution
> of changes to the ICANN Bylaws which have been specified by
> CCWG-accountability.
> The CRISP team wishes to express our concern about the lateness of the
> comments on the SLA made by ICANN, close to four months after the latest
> published version of the SLA by the RIRs.
> We would like to strongly request both ICANN and RIRs to work swiftly on
> providing additional inputs if any, so that the accountability measures
> needed for the Internet number community, can be put into place according
> to the schedule as described above. We trust that ICANN and RIRs continue
> to work constructively and transparently to finalise an SLA that respects
> the wishes of the number community.
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20160303/3491aead/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the CRISP mailing list