[CRISP-TEAM] The CRISP Team's role during the IANA Transition implementation phase
jnoulaye at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 08:51:45 CET 2016
Thank to Nurani and Izumi for their leadership and the wonderful work with
I'm happy with the observer role to assign to the CRISP team a this phase
within the Coordination Group.
I also agree that we scale back our regular conference calls to once a
month, this will help us keeping follow up the implementation process and
make comments if needed.
2016-01-26 21:23 GMT+01:00 Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se>:
> Dear CRISP Team,
> As Izumi shared with you last week, we have now handed over the
> responsibility of further IPR work to the RIRs.
> We note that the IPR issue was the only remaining issue from the
> consolidated ICG proposal which still needed to be resolved between the
> three operational communities, and where the CRISP team felt it still had a
> role to represent the views of the number community.
> With that final issue resolved, we believe that we will now move into a
> phase of implementation, which should be driven by the RIRs, and not the
> CRISP team.
> As you know, the three operational communities are forming a coordination
> group to help coordinate the implementation work between now and September.
> We propose that the CRISP team takes on an observer role in this group. The
> CRISP team will merely observe the process to ensure consistency with the
> proposal, and continue to make itself available to answer questions or
> provide clarifications as needed. Izumi and I will represent the CRISP team
> in this group and report back to the CRISP Team through our regular calls.
> The coordination calls and its minutes will also be made public and open
> to everyone.
> As we foresee minimal work for the CRISP team from now on, we also propose
> that we scale back our regular conferences calls to once a month.
> If the CRISP team agrees, we will go ahead and announce this to the global
> As this is a shift in the CRISP team’s role, we would appreciate if you
> could all explicitly express your views on this.
> Kind regards,
> Izumi & Nurani
> > Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> > Subject: [CRISP-TEAM] Update on the IRP Status
> > Date: 21 januari 2016 17:25:55 CET
> > To: "crisp at nro.net" <crisp at nro.net>
> > Dear CRISP Team,
> > I am pleased to report to you that Nurani and I have handed over the
> responsibility of further work on IPR to the RIRs.
> > The CWG has temporary agreed to work based on functional neutrality (no
> need for structural neutrality) and to work based on the IETF Trust as the
> holder, we have entered into the phase of discussing Principle Terms of the
> contracts among the three OCs.
> > I would like to make an announcement to the global ianaxfer list after
> the CWG confirms the above agreement on IPR at their next call on 21st.
> > I am at a conference right now and may not be able to work on a draft so
> quickly but will do so as soon as I can, to be shared within Monday at the
> latest (but hope to be earlier).
> > We also an IPR Coordination call among the three OCs (20th Jan UTC2100):
> > - We shared this hand over of responsibility from the CRISP Team to the
> > - Identified issues on the the Principal Terms which needs further
> coordination, and
> > - Agreed the schedule on how we work in the coming three weeks.
> > I'll share the notes once confirmed by other participants.
> > Nurani, please feel free to add anything else.
> > Izumi
> > _______________________________________________
> > CRISP mailing list
> > CRISP at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CRISP