[CRISP-TEAM] IPR: Invitation for the CRISP Chairs to join the next CWG call

[Sweeting, John]

Hi Izumi,

I think this is very well thought out and presented. I feel it represents
what we discussed on the call last week and I fully support your course of
action as outlined.

Thanks,
John

On 1/8/16, 3:28 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
<crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Dear CRISP Team,
>
>
>We had a coordination call among the OCs leaders on IPR on 7th Jan,
>UTC2200.
>I'm now circulating my rough notes among the participants and once fixed,
>I plan to share it with the CRISP Team next Tuesday.
>
>At the call, the CRISP Chairs were invited to join the next CWG call(12th
>Jan UTC1600-1800) to share the CRISP feedback on the IPR principles.
>The CWG will then have discussions on whether they agree with the CRISP
>feedback and three questions I had raised to the OCs leaders on whether:
>
>
> 1) We can agree that the IPR high level principles should be based on
>what is described in the ICG proposal and should not divert from this
>
> 2) You agree with what has been listed to be consistent with the CRISP
>IPR principles, out of the bullets listed in the CWG IPR DT document.
>    Out of the bullets in the CWG IPR DT document, anything we have
>missed to incorporate, what is consistent? Anything we have put as
>consistent, when it is not?
>
> 3) Once we complete 2), can we agree those principles as commonly agreed
>high level principles among the three OCs?
>
>
>I would like to accept this invitation with a note that:
>
> - The participation from the CRISP Chairs are based on the role to share
>the concept behind the CRISP feedback on IPR and to clarify any questions
>from the CWG.
> - Coordination of feedback from the CWG and with those of the CRISP Team
>is to take place in the discussions among the leaders of the OCs and not
>at the CWG call.
> - CWG call is for the CWG members to have discussions from the names
>community perspective. We do not intend to join the discussions by the
>CWG other than clarifications of the CRISP Team's feedback.
>   Therefore, sharing no opinions from the CRISP Chairs in the CWG
>discussions should not be interpreted as the CRISP Chairs agreeing to the
>CWG discussions.
>
>As long as the above points are acknowledged, I think it would be a good
>opportunity to share the idea behind the CRISP feedback directly with the
>CWG members, for their better understanding and further discussions.
>
>I plan to get back to the CWG Co-Chairs on Mon 11th Jan. Please let me
>know if you have any comments by Mon UTC 0800.
>
>(As a side issue, UTC1600-1800 is slightly challenging time for me as
>it's JST0100-0300. I'll coordinate with Nurani on who can join the call.)
>
>
>Izumi
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp


________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.