[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO-IANAXFER] RIRs-ICANN call 26 January 2016

[Nurani Nimpuno]

> On 23 feb 2016, at 00:20, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Good question Andrei - my assumption was that we comment when the RIRs produce the next version.
> 
> Perhaps, it may still be good to take a look at the inputs from ICANN on the SLA and provide our comment/raise question, in case we observe anything which could cause inconsistencies with the CRISP Team, just like some participants are doing, but not in a formal announcement manner?
> 
> Would be interested to hear feedback from the others. I haven't discussed with Nurani so she may have other comment.

Izumi is not only faster than me, she also formulates my thoughts better than me. :)
Full agreement from me.

Nurani


> 
> 
> Izumi 
> 
> On 2016/02/22 19:21, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>> 
>> In our new role, are we going to review comments on these amendments by
>> ICANN, or should we wait till the RIRs produce the next version and
>> review that one?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Andrei
>> 
>> 
>> Elise Gerich wrote on 21/02/16 23:41:
>>> Dear Oscar,
>>> 
>>> Many thanks for speaking with us to clarify questions we had regarding certain language in the draft SLA.  As you all requested we have prepared a redlined version where we have tried to capture and reflect what was our common understanding at the end of our discussioin. The draft with proposed edits is attached.  We welcome the continued dialogue with you to reach wording in the SLA that will reflect our mutual intentions and agreement.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> — Elise
>>> 
>>> Elise Gerich
>>> Vice President, IANA
>>> ICANN
>>> email: elise.gerich at icann.org
>>> phone: +1-310-463-1108
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: <ianaxfer-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of "Oscar A. Robles-Garay" <oscar at lacnic.net>
>>> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 3:36 AM
>>> To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
>>> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] RIRs-ICANN call 26 January 2016
>>> 
>>>> On Tuesday 26th January the RIRs (represented by the NRO EC and the RIR
>>>> lawyers) had an informal teleconference with ICANN (represented by the
>>>> IANA Operator and the ICANN lawyers) in order to discuss the third
>>>> version of the draft Service Level Agreement for the IANA Numbering
>>>> Services (third draft SLA) available here:
>>>> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Numbers-SLA-3.0-clean.pdf.
>>>> 
>>>> Following ICANN’s comments on the third draft SLA on 24 November 2015
>>>> (https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-November/000697.html ) and
>>>> RIRs’ response to these comments on 8 December 2015
>>>> (https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-December/000701.html ),
>>>> ICANN was asking for some clarifications with regards to the intentions
>>>> of Article 5 (Fees), Article 12 (Intellectual property rights and rights
>>>> over data) and Articles 9 (Failure to perform), 10 (Term and
>>>> Termination) and 13 (Resolution of disputes).
>>>> 
>>>> The RIRs provided the clarifications needed and explained the intentions
>>>> of the RIRs community as described in the CRISP proposal. Furthermore it
>>>> requested from the ICANN lawyers to propose specific edits to the third
>>>> draft SLA with the relevant justification and submit them to the
>>>> IANAXFER mailing list for transparency purposes.
>>>> 
>>>> Oscar Robles
>>>> NRO EC Chair
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp