[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO-IANAXFER] RIRs-ICANN call 26 January 2016
Sweeting, John
john.sweeting at twcable.com
Mon Feb 22 14:56:28 CET 2016
On 2/22/16, 6:20 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
<crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>Good question Andrei - my assumption was that we comment when the RIRs
>produce the next version.
+1
>
>Perhaps, it may still be good to take a look at the inputs from ICANN on
>the SLA and provide our comment/raise question, in case we observe
>anything which could cause inconsistencies with the CRISP Team, just like
>some participants are doing, but not in a formal announcement manner?
Yes, I think that anyone having comments should provide them as others are
currently doing. Agree, not formal from CRISP team.
>
>Would be interested to hear feedback from the others. I haven't discussed
>with Nurani so she may have other comment.
>
>
>Izumi
>
>On 2016/02/22 19:21, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> In our new role, are we going to review comments on these amendments by
>> ICANN, or should we wait till the RIRs produce the next version and
>> review that one?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>
>> Elise Gerich wrote on 21/02/16 23:41:
>>> Dear Oscar,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for speaking with us to clarify questions we had regarding
>>>certain language in the draft SLA. As you all requested we have
>>>prepared a redlined version where we have tried to capture and reflect
>>>what was our common understanding at the end of our discussioin. The
>>>draft with proposed edits is attached. We welcome the continued
>>>dialogue with you to reach wording in the SLA that will reflect our
>>>mutual intentions and agreement.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> ‹ Elise
>>>
>>> Elise Gerich
>>> Vice President, IANA
>>> ICANN
>>> email: elise.gerich at icann.org
>>> phone: +1-310-463-1108
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: <ianaxfer-bounces at nro.net> on behalf of "Oscar A. Robles-Garay"
>>><oscar at lacnic.net>
>>> Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 3:36 AM
>>> To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
>>> Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] RIRs-ICANN call 26 January 2016
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 26th January the RIRs (represented by the NRO EC and the
>>>>RIR
>>>> lawyers) had an informal teleconference with ICANN (represented by the
>>>> IANA Operator and the ICANN lawyers) in order to discuss the third
>>>> version of the draft Service Level Agreement for the IANA Numbering
>>>> Services (third draft SLA) available here:
>>>> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Numbers-SLA-3.0-clean.pdf.
>>>>
>>>> Following ICANN¹s comments on the third draft SLA on 24 November 2015
>>>> (https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-November/000697.html )
>>>>and
>>>> RIRs¹ response to these comments on 8 December 2015
>>>> (https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-December/000701.html ),
>>>> ICANN was asking for some clarifications with regards to the
>>>>intentions
>>>> of Article 5 (Fees), Article 12 (Intellectual property rights and
>>>>rights
>>>> over data) and Articles 9 (Failure to perform), 10 (Term and
>>>> Termination) and 13 (Resolution of disputes).
>>>>
>>>> The RIRs provided the clarifications needed and explained the
>>>>intentions
>>>> of the RIRs community as described in the CRISP proposal. Furthermore
>>>>it
>>>> requested from the ICANN lawyers to propose specific edits to the
>>>>third
>>>> draft SLA with the relevant justification and submit them to the
>>>> IANAXFER mailing list for transparency purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Oscar Robles
>>>> NRO EC Chair
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the CRISP
mailing list