[CRISP-TEAM] Next CRISP call: This week or next week?

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi Andrei, all,


Ah OK indeed.  Thanks for bring it up and I completely agree. 
I was misacknowledging the next CRISP call dates (that it was once every two weeks with Thu & Wed alternates).

May I suggest for this time, we go ahead with the call on 5th Nov.
We go back to the regular schedule after Wed 25th Nov (which is the 4th Wed of the month).

 - No one seems to have issues with the date when mentioned a few times.
   I note from your mail Andrei that you can make it.
 - 5th Nov is a nice timing after ICANN54 and the ICG work has completed
   
German, would you help us post the dates of our coming calls on the website, so people can clearly confirm? 
5th Nov and 25th Nov, same time. 

(i.e, No meeting on Thu 12th Nov)


Thanks,
Izumi

PS:
I'm saying dates which are not within the regular schedule, feel free to raise it like Andrei did.
Unless I explicitly am suggesting an irregular date, I'm likely to be just confused about the date :)



On 2015/10/30 4:50, German Valdez wrote:
> Strictly said Andrei is right. If we follow the scheduled meetings next teleconference would correspond to the second Thursday of the month. that would be November 12th.
> 
> Regards
> 
> German
> 
> 
>> On 30 Oct 2015, at 1:51 AM, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 27/10/15 16:01:
>>> Thanks for this feedback Andrei. I'm glad to know my summary shared some picture of meeting.
>>> I see no other comments, so let's have our next CRISP call as the regular schedule on 5th Nov.
>>>
>>
>> Having a call on the 5th is not a problem for me, but I note that this
>> deviates from the agreed schedule: Fortnightly meetings on 2nd Thursday
>> and 4th Wednesday of each Month.
>>
>> I want clarify this again to avoid confusion in the future - my iCal is
>> my PA, I fully rely on it ;)
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/10/27 20:10, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>> This is a great summary, Izumi - thank you for that. I feel pretty well
>>>> informed about where we are, so no need for a call this week, as far as
>>>> I am concerned.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>> Izumi_Okutani wrote on 27/10/15 00:20:
>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your feedback. Indeed that would naturally be of an interest for those who weren't in Dublin. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I personally didn't observe any issues which needs discussions within the CRISP Team soon but welcome to hear any comments from others who were there who may think differently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks John for your comment you think we can wait.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a short recap - 
>>>>>
>>>>> At ICANN 54, the biggest focus of our attention was the progress in the CCWG, on how it could affect the timelines and the transition.
>>>>>
>>>>> As described in Nurani's post last week, we observed sufficient progress in the CCWG by the end of the meeting, including challenging issues such as the choice of an implementation model. It was a big progress given the situation they were facing before Dublin.The current timeline for the CCWG's submission to the NTIA is late January, which is still within the timeframe NTIA is able to accommodate. 
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a few months a head from now since they have to go through another public comment with approval from the SOs and ACs within ICANN.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't say all issues are resolved, but we have clearly expressed the need to keep the timelines both at the general engagement session and at the working session of the CCWG. It is acknowledged by the Chairs and they have come up with creative and pragmatic timelines for moving forward as much as possible, give the need to follow the process defined within ICANN's WG and its charter.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ICG was very smooth, we expect them to get back to us to hear our input on the role of the ICG post- proposal submission. The initially planned ICG engagement session finished early without any discussions for the participants. This probably shows how smooth it was on the proposal itself :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The NTIA has made it clear that they expect the ICG and the CCWG to be submitted at the same time. The NTIA is familiar with the proposals and have been following up the discussions. Therefore, they would not see the proposals from scratch as something completely new to them in January. 
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition, Nurani and I met up with the other OCs leaders (protocols and names) and the implementation team of ICANN. It was basically introductory and no decisions made. On the IPR we shared the principles and that we observe no inconsistency with those principles as the approach shared on the IANAPLAN.
>>>>> The CWG has not yet started discussions. 
>>>>>
>>>>> We expect to have a follow up call this week or next week to discuss how the OCs coordinate together with ICANN when they are involved, on the implementation of the transition as a whole, not just for the numbers. Especially on IPR we need coordination among the three OCs of course. The CRISP Team's role is expected to focus on clarifying the intention of the proposal, as we have always done, and the implementation details are to be considered by the RIRs. 
>>>>>
>>>>> That is pretty much an overview of key points at the meeting while there are individual issues which are still being discussed in the CCWG .
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on this, if Andrei or anyone else, especially those who were not in Dublin see topics which you would like to further hear details verbally /discuss this week rather than to wait until next week, please don't hesitate to express it. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Others who were in Dublin are most welcome to share your observations , either here on the list or at the coming call. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Izumi 
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from iPhone 
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015/10/27 0:27、Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Izumi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 26/10/15 16:15:
>>>>>>> There is a recap from ICANN54 meeting, which can also wait until the regular call next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be the main thing I'd like to have a call this week. But if
>>>>>> nothing substantively affecting the transition for numbers happened at
>>>>>> ICANN I am happy to wait till Nov 5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>