[CRISP-TEAM] [Feedback until Tue 6th Oct] Re: IANA IPR Minimum Requirements document - for CRISP Team agreement

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi Nurani, all,


>> The entity has human resources with expertise on the IPR. We may
>> want to add something like "with proven record" to this as well but
>> I'd like to hear thoughts from the CRISP Team members about this
>> point.
> 
> I agree, but I think that is captured already by:
> 
> - Is neutral, trusted by the community of IANA stakeholders and has a
> proven track record of competence and transparency
> 
> If you feel this doesn’t adequately address your concern, maybe we
> can strengthen this part a little? Did you want to add something
> specifically about competence in holding IPRs? And
> bottom-up/community driven organisation serving the public and
> broader community?

I wasn't sure from the reading what we mean by "competence" and find it a little vague.
If we can say "competence *on IPR*", that would work for me.

(I feel we should clearly state that holder has expertise on the IPR)

I continue to welcome any other feedback!



Izumi



On 2015/10/05 18:56, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
> 
> 
>> On 1 okt 2015, at 05:25, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you very much Paul for sharing these IPR principles.
>> 
>> It covers key points IMO and I just have one suggestion.
>> 
>> The entity has human resources with expertise on the IPR. We may
>> want to add something like "with proven record" to this as well but
>> I'd like to hear thoughts from the CRISP Team members about this
>> point.
> 
> I agree, but I think that is captured already by:
> 
> - Is neutral, trusted by the community of IANA stakeholders and has a
> proven track record of competence and transparency
> 
> If you feel this doesn’t adequately address your concern, maybe we
> can strengthen this part a little? Did you want to add something
> specifically about competence in holding IPRs? And
> bottom-up/community driven organisation serving the public and
> broader community?
> 
> Nurani
> 
> 
>> CRISP Team, I call for your inputs on the IPR principles before
>> Tuesday 6th Oct UTC23:59. Please also share whether you are
>> comfortable for the CRISP Team to support the described approach
>> about IPR at IANAPLAN, based on the number community proposal and the
>> draft IPR principles.
>> 
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/gbPZgVdXAKIQKJRM1po6Nbod-6w
>>
>>
>> 
We will then discuss it at the coming CRISP call on Thursday October 8th UTC13:00.
>> 
>> 
>> Izumi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2015/10/01 0:29, Paul Rendek wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>> 
>>> Firstly, please let me apologise for the length of time it took
>>> to produce the IANA IPR Miniumum Requirements document for your
>>> comment and approval. It was drafted ages ago and I simply forgot
>>> to send it along.
>>> 
>>> Please find below, the draft text of the IANA IPR Minimum
>>> Requirements that I agreed to produce and send along for CRISP
>>> team reveiw and and eventual approval.
>>> 
>>> If you have any comment on the text please send this along to the
>>> list before Monday, 5 October.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Paul
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ===
>>> 
>>> *IANA Intellectual Property Rights: Minimum Requirements*
>>> 
>>> * *
>>> 
>>> This document outlines the Internet Number Community’s minimum 
>>> requirements regarding IANA Intellectual Property Rights (IPR),
>>> as expressed in the Number Community proposal.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *Minimum Requirements Regarding the IANA Trademark//and
>>> IANA.ORG//*
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain name will be
>>> associated with the IANA numbering services and not with a
>>> particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain will be transferred
>>> and permanently held by an organisation that:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -       Is not the IANA Numbering Services Operator
>>> 
>>> -       Is an entity independent of the IANA Numbering Services
>>> Operator
>>> 
>>> -       Is neutral, trusted by the community of IANA stakeholders
>>> and has a proven track record of competence and transparency
>>> 
>>> -       Will facilitate a smooth transition of licenses and
>>> permissions should another operator (or operators) be selected in
>>> the future
>>> 
>>> -       Will ensure that these assets are used in a
>>> non-discriminatory manner for the benefit of the entire Internet
>>> community
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *Minimum Requirements Regarding the IPR Status of Registries
>>> Related to the Performance of the IANA Numbering Services*
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IPR status of registries related to the performance of IANA 
>>> numbering services must ensure free and unrestricted access to
>>> the public registry data throughout the stewardship transition
>>> and beyond.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In particular:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -       The IANA Number Registries must be in the public domain
>>> 
>>> -       Non-public information related to the IANA number
>>> resource registries and corresponding services, including the
>>> provision of reverse DNS delegation in IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA,
>>> is managed by the IANA operator and will be transferred to its
>>> successor(s)
>>> 
>>> -       All rights to non-public information related to the IANA
>>> number resource registries and corresponding services must be
>>> transferred to the RIRs
>>> 
>>> 
>>> == end
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ CRISP mailing
>>> list CRISP at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ CRISP mailing list 
>> CRISP at nro.net https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>