[CRISP-TEAM] first draft review of the SLA v1.0

[Sweeting, John]

Thanks again Andrei, very well done. I do agree with Izumi that a summary
paragraph with overall general comments would be useful as a lead in.



On 5/27/15, 8:55 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Andrei and all,
>
>
>Thank you very much Andrei for compiling the review, including the
>community feedback. I agree with the analysis.
>
>In addition to the analysis, when sharing this with the global community,
>I would find it useful to add:
>
> - General observation about the SLA if possible, in addition to review
>per principle, such as it is basically consistent with the numbers
>proposal except...
> - If there is any element in the numbers proposal, intentionally not
>reflected in the SLA, it would be helpful to highlight what they are
>
>These points are for when sharing with the ianaxfer list for comments and
>no need to be incorporated as the comment we submit to the NRO.
>I also have two questions about the clauses in the SLA, which perhaps
>Craig or/and Michael could help to clarify.
>
>
>11.1
>The Operator shall prepare a plan for this purpose and submit this plan
>to the RIRs (18) months after the date of this Agreement.
>
>Question:
>May I  assume it is set after 18 months to give some time for the
>Operator for the preparation? If yes, do we not need to set a limit of
>period in preparation, in case it does not get completed unless specified?
>
>12.1.1
>To the extent that the Operator possesses rights in and to any
>intellectual property, including but not limited to copyrights,
>trademarks and service marks,
>related to the performance of its obligations under this Agreement,
>Operator does hereby assign and transfer any and all right, title and
>interest in and to such intellectual property rights to the RIRs, their
>successors, assigns and designee.
>
>Question:
>Am I reading this right that the intellectual property rights transfer to
>RIRs, including trademarks and service marks?
>
>
>Talk to you all shortly!
>
>
>Regards,
>Izumi
>
>
>On 2015/05/27 3:27, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> I attach a first draft of the analysis of the SLA for your review and
>> comments. I tried to include some of the comments from the community,
>> although I wasn't able to fit them all in. Partly, because I felt some
>> of them were outside the scope of this analysis limited to checking the
>> conformance of the SLA provisions with each of the CRISP SLA Principles.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.