[CRISP-TEAM] Updated Draft Comment to the CWG Proposal
john.sweeting at twcable.com
Mon May 18 19:41:56 CEST 2015
I like the rewording, makes it easier to follow for everyone.
On 5/18/15, 1:09 PM, "Nurani Nimpuno" <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
>Thank you so much for your excellent work.
>This looks good to me.
>Just one quick comment.
>When we talk about the Review Committee, in relation to the Review Team,
>it might be obvious to us what we are referring to, but it might not be
>Therefore, can I suggest that we reword the paragraph about the Review
>Committee as follows:
>> - The Numbers community requires no additional reviews or
>>organizational structures beyond the Review Committee monitoring the
>>service levels for the Numbers functions and advising the RIRs
>- The Numbers community requires no additional reviews or organizational
>structures beyond the Review Committee which is specified in the Numbers
>community proposal. The Number community's Review Committee is tasked
>with monitoring the service levels for the Numbers functions and advising
>the RIRs accordingly.
>Other than that, I don't have anything else to add at this point.
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the CRISP