[CRISP-TEAM] Letter to ICG May 6

[Bill Woodcock]

> I ask that the community provide us with an update on the status of the transition planning and the associated timeframes, including the community’s views as to how long it will take to finalize the transition plan and implement it after it is approved. We request that you provide us your views before the end of June.

My view is that we should encourage the ICG (and NTIA) to stick to the agreed-upon timeline, as applied to the Numbers (and presumably Protocol) communities, and free the Names community to arrive at the best possible conclusion, in their own time.  As it is, they’re under artificial and unnecessary pressure to come to a hasty conclusion, in order to meet the timeline we did.  That seems to me to be bad for both them, and for us, while being completely artificial and unnecessary.

I hope that the ICG will move forward by asking NTIA to transition the Numbers and Protocols portions of the IANA functions on the agreed-to timeline, while allowing Names to define their own timeline.

2/3 Success!!!

                                -Bill



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Letter to ICG May 6.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 589005 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150506/c8786db9/LettertoICGMay6.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150506/c8786db9/signature.asc>