[CRISP-TEAM] CRISP Proposal FAQ

Tue Mar 31 00:57:02 CEST 2015

Hi

May I request any comments for the second version of the FAQ document by this Wednesday COB

If you are okI’ll incorporate any further comments to the document and proceed with the publication in the NRO website

Cheers!

German

> On 25 Mar 2015, at 1:46 am, German Valdez <german at nro.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear CRISP Team
> 
> For your perusal, Please find in attachment second version of FAQ document based on your input.
> 
> Regards
> 
> German
> 
> <Internet_Numbers_FAQ_v2.docx>
> 
>> On 23 Mar 2015, at 7:01 pm, German Valdez <german at nro.net <mailto:german at nro.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi 
>> 
>> At this stage I’m closing comments.
>> 
>> Comeback soon with a newer version. Thank you for your feedback,
>> 
>> German
>> 
>>> On 20 Mar 2015, at 12:33 am, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp <mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> CRISP Team,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I realised I sent my input for the FAQ only to German yesterday.
>>> 
>>> Attached is the FAQ with my edits.
>>> 
>>> I welcome feedback from others.
>>> 
>>> German,
>>> Please let us know when you would like to close feedback from us so you can fix the FAQ ready to be posted.
>>> 
>>> FYI, I will be out office fro 23-25 March, fully engaged in another meetings and not able to be engaged in the CRISP related work.
>>> If you need any confirmation/decision as from the CRISP Team during those period, I delegate the final decision to Alan, if he would be avaiable on those days.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Izumi
>>> 
>>> On 2015/03/19 0:23, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>>> My feedback inline for the FAQ.
>>>> 
>>>> My aplogies it's perhaps not so easy to see.
>>>> I'll send the clean version tomorrow morning my time, when I'm more refreshed :)
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> INTERNET NUMBERS COMMUNITY PROPOSAL FAQ
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> How was the Internet numbers community proposal developed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Internet numbers community proposal is the result of discussions regarding IANA stewardship in all five RIR regional communities, and reflects the output of each of these discussions. Each of the RIRs has published archives of these community discussions on their websites, as well as the positions that came out of those discussions.
>>>> 
>>>> The AFRINIC IANA oversight transition information page: http://www.afrinic.net/en/community/ianaoversight-transition <http://www.afrinic.net/en/community/ianaoversight-transition>
>>>> The APNIC IANA oversight transition information page  : http://www.apnic.net/community/iana-transition <http://www.apnic.net/community/iana-transition>
>>>> The ARIN IANA oversight transition information page   : http://teamarin.net/education/internet-governance/iana-transition <http://teamarin.net/education/internet-governance/iana-transition>
>>>> The LACNIC IANA oversight transition information page : http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/ <http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/>
>>>> The RIPE IANA oversight transition information page   : https://www.ripe.net/iana-discussions <https://www.ripe.net/iana-discussions>
>>>> 
>>>>> To develop a unified proposal, a Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team was convened in December 2014. This team is made up of two community members and one RIR staff member from each RIR service region. Working between December 2014 and January 2015, the CRISP team met regularly via public teleconferences and held discussions via publicly archived mailing lists to draft the Internet numbers community proposal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Archives of all of this work and these discussions are available at:
>>>>> https://nro.net/crisp-team <https://nro.net/crisp-team>
>>>> 
>>>> See "VI. Community Process" of the numbers proposal for more details.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> What new ���oversight��� mechanism is being proposed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Internet numbers community proposes establishing a new stewardship mechanism as follows:
>>>>> 
>>>>> -    NTIA ends their contractual relationship with ICANN
>>>> 
>>>> I suggest delete. This is not a part of the proposal - this is a condition as a result of NTIA's stewardship transition and we are not proposing this ourselves.
>>>> 
>>>>> -    A new contractual arrangement is established between the RIRs (as community-based stewards of the Internet number registry system) and the IANA Numbering Services Operator (ICANN) for the provision of IANA Numbering Services (which include management and distribution of Internet number resources from the global pools).
>>>> 
>>>> Is  "Internet number registry system" a common agreed term used by NRO? Confirming for consistency.
>>>> (I am more familiar with "Internet number resources management" as it is not just the registry system)
>>>> 
>>>> -    A new contractual arrangement is established between the RIRs (as community-based stewards of the ##TBC:Internet number registry system##) and the IANA Numbering Services Operator (ICANN) for the provision of IANA Numbering Services (described in Section " I.A. The service or activity" of the numbers proposal)
>>>> -    Establishment of a Review Committee, with representatives from each RIR, to advise the NRO EC on the review of the IANA functions operator���s performance and meeting of identified service levels.
>>>> 
>>>>> The proposal includes a list of 12 principles that reflect the global community���s priorities and concerns, taking into consideration elements in the existing NTIA agreements that, in the interest of stability and continuity, could be integrated in the new contract. However, the CRISP team's proposal does not include a detailed set of legal provisions, as these are expected to be drafted by legal staff from the RIRs.
>>>> 
>>>> The proposal on SLA
>>>> 
>>>>> The proposed arrangement would place stewardship of the global Internet number resource pools in the hands of the open RIR communities, represented by the RIRs as contract holders.
>>>> 
>>>> Based on these principles, the RIRs will develop
>>>> 
>>>> However, the CRISP team's proposal does not include a detailed set of legal provisions, as these are expected to be drafted by legal staff from the RIRs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does the numbers community proposal suggest ���breaking up��� the IANA functions?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Internet numbers community proposal notes the critical importance of coordination across the various IANA functions; it does not suggest that these functions should have different operators. The communities have also expressed a clear priority for continuity and stability in the operation of the IANA functions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The proposal does identify a specific subset of the IANA functions ���the IANA Numbering Services��� which are of specific relevance to the Internet number community and over which that community has authority. In the same way, the proposal assumes that those IANA functions relating to domain names and protocol parameters fall under the authority of the open communities dealing with those functions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In that sense, instead of "breaking up" the IANA functions, the proposal suggests splitting the stewardship of the IANA functions, with each "affected community" (the communities concerned with numbers, names and protocol parameters, as identified by the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group) acting as steward for a subset of the IANA functions. This could mean that a single IANA functions operator (such as ICANN) would have contractual relationships with each of these three communities or their representatives.
>>>> 
>>>> This is reflecting the realities of stakeholders of each of the IANA function, as it can be observed from the fact that there are three operational communities.
>>>> 
>>>>> Should these communities decide at some point in the future that different operators should manage these functions, the proposal stresses the importance of coordination across all IANA steward and operational parties.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The CRISP proposal is based on the understanding that the numbers community has stewardship of the number-related IANA functions. But this does not preclude numbers community support for a single, complete IANA stewardship solution to be developed by the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG), as long as that solution respects and incorporates the authority of the open, bottom-up numbers community.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would ICANN continue to serve as the IANA functions operator?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Internet numbers community proposal does not suggest changing the IANA functions operator (which would remain ICANN). This reflects the satisfaction of the numbers communities with current IANA operations and the high priority that these communities place on stability and continuity.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, by making the RIRs the contract holding entities, the proposed arrangement would allow for future changes to the operational arrangement and parties. This is an important aspect of the proposal, as it ensures the independence and authority of the bottom-up community decision-making process.
>>>> 
>>>> This is also a key element of ensuring accountability of the IANA Numbering Services operator to maintain stable, reliable and secure service.
>>>> 
>>>>> The CRISP proposal does not in any way affect the structure, arrangements or processes for IANA-related policy-making, including ICANN's role in the global Policy Development Process (gPDP, as detailed in the attachment to the ASO Memorandum of Understanding). If the role of IANA functions operator were to move to a different entity, the ICANN Board would retain its role in ratifying global policy proposals. Changing the gPDP would require an entirely separate discussion and process.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Izumi
>>>> 
>>>> On 2015/03/11 9:54, German Valdez wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I���������m attaching an FAQ about CRISP proposal drafted by the RIR communications group.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The intention of this document is to clarify current and potential misunderstandings of the content of the proposal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The NRO EC would like to have your input / comments of this FAQ and eventually your endorsement as this will be published and in the NRO website.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe we could add the discussion of this document for this Friday Teleconference
>>>>> 
>>>>> Additionally, as a heads up,  a new set of presentation slides explaining the proposal is on production.  This will require as well your review and input.
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> German
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>> CRISP at nro.net <mailto:CRISP at nro.net>
>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> <Internet_Numbers_FAQ_final_NCC-izumi2.docx>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150331/bb2c29e1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Internet_Numbers_FAQ_v2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 82110 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150331/bb2c29e1/Internet_Numbers_FAQ_v2.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150331/bb2c29e1/attachment-0001.html>