[CRISP-TEAM] Factors for implementaion which affects the timelines
Andrei Robachevsky
robachevsky at isoc.org
Wed Jun 10 23:45:17 CEST 2015
Hi,
Izumi Okutani wrote on 10/06/15 17:19:
[...]
>
> Perhaps it would be the best to leave it the RIR staff beyond this point.
>
I agree.
The NTIA contract also required that ICANN produces a transition plan.
Perhaps this plan could be a good basis for this work.
But more importantly we (or the RIRs) should make up their mind if this
fallback mechanism is part of the implementation, or not. In the former
case the plan should be integrated in the SLA. And for the latter case -
this item doesn't seem applicable.
>
> Izumi
>
Andrei
>
> On 2015/06/10 1:11, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Thank you Izumi,
>>
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 09/06/15 16:40:
>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>
>>>
>>>> Could you please elaborate what you mean by "fallback mechanism"?
>>>
>>> Sure, the idea is in case the RIRs have to switch the IANA Function Operator.
>>> Basically it is the point Vint Cerf has raised on the ianaxfer list.
>>>
>>
>> Understood.
>>
>> Looking at this from a formal point of view isn't this what is in
>> Article 11 of the SLA "Continuity of operations"? Or do you think this
>> work will lead to changes in this article, prescribing specific fallback
>> mechanisms?
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>>> I can think of be two situation:
>>>
>>> 1. When RIRs need to switch the IFO as emergency due to serious failure in service level
>>> - Need to switch in a short period of time and there is no gurantee the existing IFO will be able to provide the data needed, within the timeframe needed for the switch
>>> - Steps need to be defined on how to do this as well as identifying the need for data escrow for non-public data
>>>
>>> 2. When RIRs switch the IFO with advanced notice
>>> - Likely to have time for preparation but need to define steps
>>> - If we are making open RFP, setting the criteria may be another factor in preparing implementation
>>>
>>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/06/09 23:29, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>> Hi Izumi,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please elaborate what you mean by "fallback mechanism"?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 05/06/15 21:18:
>>>>> d. Fallback mechanism
>>>>> - Identify elements which needs fallback mechanism
>>>>> - Define process
>>>>> - Analyse possible impact
>>>>> - Identify the need of RFP and if needed draft one
>>>
>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list