[CRISP-TEAM] Factors for implementaion which affects the timelines

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks Mwendwa for your input.

>>  b. Review Committee
>>    - Drafting the charter
>>    - Consultation with the community
>>    - Final call for comments for the revised chater
>>    - Selection process of the Review Committee
> <SNIP>
> 
> Composition (number of members) of review committee

Yes, this is indeed is an element which needs to be fined, possibly as a part of the charter.
It's useful to have this clearly identified, thanks.


CRISP Team,
This is a reminder that we are still open to suggestion on factors which affects the implementation until this Friday 12th June.


Izumi


On 2015/06/07 7:25, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2015 8:18 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>> CRISP Team,
>>
>>
>> As a follow up from the call with the NRO EC, I would like to start
> listing the factors which would affect the timelines of the implementation
> of the numbers proposal.
>>
>>  a. SLA text
>>    - Consultation with the numbers commnunity
>>    - Negotiation with the ICANN
>>    - Re-consultation with the numbers community (on the revised text)
>>
>>  b. Review Committee
>>    - Drafting the charter
>>    - Consultation with the community
>>    - Final call for comments for the revised chater
>>    - Selection process of the Review Committee
> <SNIP>
> 
> Composition (number of members) of review committee
> 
> </snip>
>>
>>  c. IPR
>>    - Coordination among the three operational communities
>>    - Community consultation if needed
>>    - Negotiation with the ICANN
>>    - Re-consultation with the numbers community (if revision is needed)
>>
>>  d. Fallback mechanism
>>    - Identify elements which needs fallback mechanism
>>    - Define process
>>    - Analyse possible impact
>>    - Identify the need of RFP and if needed draft one
>>
>>
>> These are just my very rough preliminary thoughts as starting point of
> discussions.
>> Please contribute to brush this up. I welcome contributions by CRISP Team
> members from RIRs, as well as other CRISP Team memebers.
>>
>> Below is the suggested next steps:
>>
>>  9th  June   Preliminary response to the ICG (whether or not we are
> willing to draft the the timelines and broad area)
>>  12th June   Complete listing implementation elements
>>  19th June   Complete listing timelines per implementation elements
>>  25th June   Review the timelines per implementation elements/formatting
>>  26th June   Submission to the ICG
>>
>>
>> This is not coordinated with Nurani and suggeted next steps are also open
> to your feedback, and revision as needed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>