[CRISP-TEAM] [Reminder: Comment on SLA close today 2nd June ] Re: Call for comments from the CRISP Team Re: first draft review of the SLA v1.0
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Jun 3 11:33:25 CEST 2015
On 2015/06/03 18:12, Janvier Noulaye wrote:
> 2015-06-03 10:03 GMT+01:00 Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org>:
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/06/15 10:54:
>>> Yes, I think I am confused about the same part.
>> Since this part s confusing, a better approach may be to clearly state
>> our expectation in the analysis, rather than guessing what the precise
>> meaning of 12.1.1. could be.
> ���Maybe Craig could also more elaborate his statement to clear up the
Yes that would certainly be helpful if Craig (or Michael) could help us in clarifying this point.
In the interests of time, and sharing with the global list today, in parallel to above, I suggest we still prepare our suggested response based on our interpretation, and make our observation to be conditional based on what we interpret.
>> How about:
>> This principle is adequately addressed in Article 12. In our
>> understanding this provision covers potential IPRs and trademarks,
>> excluding the IANA trademark, IANA.ORG and the public registry data. In
>> our understanding the expected arrangements for these assets will have
>> happened (i.e. transferred to the IETF Trust and declared as being in
>> the public domain) before the SLA is signed, and therefore are outside
>> the scope of this Agreement.
>> We also note that such arrangements will need to be documented and
>> implemented in other agreements between all of the relevant actors
>> (which include more than the parties to this SLA).
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP