[CRISP-TEAM] [Reminder: Comment on SLA close today 2nd June ] Re: Call for comments from the CRISP Team Re: first draft review of the SLA v1.0

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi Andrei and all,


On 2015/06/03 18:03, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/06/15 10:54:
>> Yes, I think I am confused about the same part.
> 
> Since this part s confusing, a better approach may be to clearly state
> our expectation in the analysis, rather than guessing what the precise
> meaning of 12.1.1. could be.

I agree.


> How about:
> 
> This principle is adequately addressed in Article 12. In our

I think this is conditional, so suggeste to add *if*

> understanding this provision covers potential IPRs and trademarks,
> excluding the IANA trademark, IANA.ORG and the public registry data. In
> our understanding the expected arrangements for these assets will have
> happened (i.e. transferred to the IETF Trust and declared as being in
> the public domain) before the SLA is signed, and therefore are outside
> the scope of this Agreement.

I am not sure if we have a preference on which one to happen first.
I would focus that it's outside the SLA because the stakeholders are different, and not because of the difference in timing of the implementation.

On more minor point, IETF Trust is one of the options so would be good to have more clarity about that.

> We also note that such arrangements will need to be documented and
> implemented in other agreements between all of the relevant actors
> (which include more than the parties to this SLA).
> 


My suggestion based on the comments I made above inline:


This principle is adequately addressed in Article 12, if this provision covers potential IPRs and trademarks, but
excluding the IANA trademark, IANA.ORG and the public registry data. 

In our understanding the expected arrangements for these assets (i.e. transferred to, the IETF Trust for example, and declared as being in
the public domain) will be handled seperately between the relevant stakeholders, not just between RIRs and the IANA Functions Operator, and therefore are outside
the scope of this Agreement.

We also note that such arrangements will need to be documented and
implemented in other agreements between all of the relevant actors
(which include more than the parties to this SLA).



Izumi